Did Pearl Harbor Kill off the Lost State of Jefferson?

The secessionist project hit its stride at exactly the worst time possible

Did Pearl Harbor Kill off the Lost State of Jefferson?

Step up and meet Jefferson, the 49th state of the Union, this pamphlet announces. The proponents of this U.S. state-to-be, made up of California’s northern parts and southern bits of Oregon, seem to have been firm believers in the strategy of the fait accompli, for their handbill states:


If you preserve the map above, you may be acquiring an historic piece of americana to pass on to your descendents. It’s one of the first ever drawn of the new, 49th “State of Jefferson” which 45,000 secessionists of Oregon and California hope to carve out of their states.

But the fact of Jefferson was never accomplished, the secession never consummated. Unbeknownst to the jeffersonists, the tide of history would soon turn against them. Very soon: note the date on the pamphlet – Dec. 6, 1941. One day later, a Japanese sneak attack would destroy the American Pacific Fleet.

This meant, among a great many other things, no more time for frivolous secessionism. And so the idea of a state named for Thomas Jefferson was killed off. This time by the Japanese aggression, but hardly for the first time.

The lost state of Jefferson is a star-crossed, but particularly persistent project in American history. From the middle of the 19th century, the name of the third U.S. president has been attached to at least three unsuccessful attempts at state-building.

  • The first was the Territory (1) of Jefferson (1859-1861), a rectangular slab of the Wild West occupying all of present-day Colorado and parts of Utah, Wyoming, Kansas and Nebraska. This Territory, partly overlapping the Territory of Kansas, was never recognised by the federal government, which organised the Territory of Colorado as its successor.
  • In 1870, during the Reconstruction following the Civil War, a bill was introduced in Congress to split off two territories from Texas, to be admitted as two separate states into the Union: Jefferson (east of the San Antonio river) and Matagorda (west of the Colorado river). But the bill died; Texas remains undivided (2).
  • The proposal pertaining to the area portrayed in this map was first formulated in October 1941. As is often the case with border areas, both sides of the California-Oregon line felt neglected by their respective state governments. It was in fact the dismal condition of the state roads on either side of the border that pushed Gilbert Gable, mayor of the small coastal town of Port Orford, to announce the creation of a new state.

    Gable’s secessionism first and foremost was a wake-up call for both state governments, but it developed a momentum all of its own. The city of Yreka, seat of Siskiyou County in California, was proclaimed the ‘provisional capital’ of the future state. In November, a ‘constitutional assembly’ met in town to provide the secessionist project with a name (Orofino, Bonanza and Discontent were mooted, among others) and a governor (Yreka judge John C. Childs). The fledgling state was even endowed with a flag.

    On November 27, 1941, the movement took up arms.

    A ‘Citizen’s Committee’, armed with hunting rifles, occupied a stretch of U.S. Route 99, handing out pamphlets proclaiming Jefferson’s ‘independence’ (possibly similar to the pamphlet which is partially shown here). The mainly good-natured incident – the rebels promised to “secede every Thursday until further notice” – was recorded by the main newsreel companies. But the light-hearted item lingered long enough in transit and in cutting rooms to be pushed off the news agenda by Pearl Harbor.

    The third incarnation of Jefferson did not have a very fixed circumscription. ‘Secession’ was only (half-)seriously entertained by the Oregon county of Curry and the California counties of Del Norte, Siskiyou and Trinity (not included on this map; south of Siskiyou’s western half). This map also includes the more reluctant secessionists of Modoc and Lassen counties. Other proposals extend Jefferson’s borders further to the south and north.

    This map was taken here from the Flickr page for Lost States, a project which is also Facebook group and a blog, but mainly a beautiful and very entertaining bookSome of the state projects in the book were discussed earlier on this blog and in the Strange Maps book (e.g. Sequoia, #147).

     Strange Maps #458

     Got a strange map? Let me know at strangemaps@gmail.com.

    (1) lands newly acquired by the United States were often first administered as Territories, under the direct jurisdiction of the federal government. Territories could be either  incorporated (i.e. part of the U.S.) or not, and organised (i.e. with a government recognised by the U.S. Congress) or not. Thirty-one of the present 50 states were previously territories, including the last two to gain statehood, in 1959 (Alaska and Hawaii, which were both organised and incorporated). The U.S. continues to administer several territories, all outside the continental U.S. – these are either organised but not incorporated (e.g. Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico), or incorporated but not organised (Palmyra Atoll, an uninhabited nature reserve). A handful of uninhabited islands and atolls in the Pacific and the Caribbean are U.S. territories that are both unincorporated and unorganised.

    (2) a curious provision in the annexation of Texas by the US in 1845 stipulates that up to four new states may be carved out of the Lone Star state, which then would gain admission to the US automatically. Over the years, several plans to that effect have been mooted – obviously with no effect (as yet).

     

    A brief history of human dignity

    What is human dignity? Here's a primer, told through 200 years of great essays, lectures, and novels.

    Credit: Benjavisa Ruangvaree / AdobeStock
    Sponsored by the Institute for Humane Studies
    • Human dignity means that each of our lives have an unimpeachable value simply because we are human, and therefore we are deserving of a baseline level of respect.
    • That baseline requires more than the absence of violence, discrimination, and authoritarianism. It means giving individuals the freedom to pursue their own happiness and purpose.
    • We look at incredible writings from the last 200 years that illustrate the push for human dignity in regards to slavery, equality, communism, free speech and education.
    Keep reading Show less

    Urban foxes self-evolve, exhibiting Darwin’s domestication syndrome

    A new study finds surprising evidence of the self-evolution of urban foxes.

    A fox at the door of 10 Downing Street on Janurary 13, 2015.

    Photo by JUSTIN TALLIS/AFP via Getty Images
    Surprising Science
    • A study from the University of Glasgow finds urban foxes evolved differently compared to rural foxes.
    • The skulls of the urban foxes are adapted to scavenging for food rather than hunting it.
    • The evolutionary changes correspond to Charles Darwin's "domestication syndrome."

    How much can living in the city change you? If you were an urban fox, you could be evolving yourself to a whole new stage and becoming more like a dog, according to a fascinating new study.

    Researchers compared skulls from rural foxes around London with foxes who lived inside the city and found important variations. Rural foxes showed adaptation for speed and hunting after quick, small prey, while urban fox skulls exhibited changes that made it easier for them to scavenge, looking through human refuse for food, rather than chasing it. Their snouts were shorter and stronger, making it easier to open packages and chew up leftovers. They also have smaller brains, not meant for hunting but for interacting with stationary food sources, reports Science magazine.

    Interestingly, there was much similarity found between the male and female skulls of the urban foxes.

    The observed changes correspond to what Charles Darwin called the "domestication syndrome," comprised of traits that go along with an animal's transition from being wild, to tamed, to domesticated.

    The study was led by Kevin Parsons, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Glasgow.

    "What's really fascinating here is that the foxes are doing this to themselves," Parsons told the BBC. "This is the result of foxes that have decided to live near people, showing these traits that make them look more like domesticated animals."

    The researchers are not suggesting you should go out and get a fox as a house-pet just yet. But they are seeing the evolutionary process taking place that's moving the urban foxes along the path towards becoming more like dogs and cats, explained the study's co-author Dr. Andrew Kitchener from National Museums Scotland.

    A fox beneath a tree in Greenwich park, south east London

    A fox beneath a tree in Greenwich park, south east London on May 14, 2020.

    Photo by Glyn KIRK / AFP

    "Some of the basic environmental aspects that may have occurred during the initial phases of domestication for our current pets, like dogs and cats, were probably similar to the conditions in which our urban foxes and other urban animals are living today," said Kitchener. "So, adapting to life around humans actually primes some animals for domestication."

    The specimen came from the National Museum Scotland's collection of around 1,500 fox skulls.

    You can read the study in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

    fox sleeping beneath stadium seats

    A fox at the LV County Championship, Division two match between Surrey and Derbyshire at The Brit Oval on April 9, 2010 in London, England.

    Photo by Clive Rose/Getty Images

    ​'The time is now' for cryptocurrencies, PayPal CEO says

    Is Bitcoin akin to 'digital gold'?

    Technology & Innovation
    • In October, PayPal announced that it would begin allowing users to buy, sell, and hold cryptocurrencies.
    • Other major fintech companies—Square, Fidelity, SoFi—have also recently begun investing heavily in cryptocurrencies.
    • While prices are volatile, many investors believe cryptocurrencies are a relatively safe bet because blockchain technology will prove itself over the long term.
    Keep reading Show less

    "Clean meat" approved for sale in Singapore

    Singapore has approved the sale of a lab-grown meat product in an effort to secure its food supplies against disease and climate change.

    Credit: Adobe Stock / Big Think
    Politics & Current Affairs
  • Singapore has become the first country to approve the sale of a lab-grown meat product.
  • Eat Just, the company behind the product, will have a small-scale commercial launch of its chicken bites.
  • So-called "clean meats" may reduce our reliance on livestock farming, which kills billions of animals worldwide every year.
  • Keep reading Show less
    Scroll down to load more…
    Quantcast