Richard Tafel: 5 Steps for Systems Change
Rich Tafel is founder of The Public Squared, a public policy training program for nonprofits and social entrepreneurs.
For the last decade, Tafel has provided strategic policy advice to nonprofits on a variety of causes, including AIDS programs for Africa, civil rights programs Latin America, and education and health care reform in the United States. He is a guest lecturer in Urban Health and Advocacy at Johns Hopkins University.
Prior to his international consulting, Tafel founded the Log Cabin Republicans in 1993. During his tenure, the Log Cabin Republicans went from an unknown entity to a well-known brand in American political life. At the height of the culture wars, he debated the likes of the Reverend Jerry Fallwell on Larry King Live. He has appeared on most major political TV programs and fought for appropriate AIDS funding and equality for gays and lesbians. He testified before Congress on the need to support the Ryan White Care Act. In 1999, he authored Party Crasher: A Gay Republican Challenges Politics as Usual. Tafel has also been appointed by Governor Weld (R-MA) to manage the adolescent health programs of Massachusetts.
Tafel's work in the public policy arena for social justice causes is inspired by his faith. After graduating from Harvard Divinity School he served at the University Chapel. He is an ordained minister in the Swedenborgian Church. He is a certified coach through Franklin Covey and certified through the International Coaching Association. He's an alumni of the Prince of Wales, Business and Sustainability Program, Cambridge College.
Richard Tafel: My sense is that right now in the world all of our systems are breaking down. The faith systems are breaking down, education systems, healthcare systems, environmental systems. So the global leader for social change is going to have to understand how to change systems.
Most social change programs today are symptoms-based. But I can say as a young man in the ‘80s working as an AIDS buddy—where you volunteered, they died after two months; you volunteered, they died after two months—you very quickly said, "Wow, we can kind of do a better job of burying people or we’re going to have to get involved with systems change." So what does that mean? We had to learn about government policy on drugs, discrimination laws. . . . That particular epidemic was so dramatic that it almost drove us to that conclusion.
Much of the work that I do with social entrepreneurs and clients, it feels a lot like the Titanic is sinking and they’re bragging about what beautiful, clever lifeboats they’re putting off the side for a small group of kids who get rescued from this school, from this broken healthcare system, in this lucky place. And we kind of laud these people getting into the lifeboats. And we’ve gotten bigger lifeboats and faster lifeboats and prettier lifeboats, but the reality is a lot of people are going down. And there’s a great line in that story of the Titanic where the captain says . . . he asked the band to play to allay fear. I think a lot of what we say is social change and non-profit is allaying fear. We’re pretending like we’re doing something, but we’re not dealing with systems. So let me offer five possible ways that you might change systems.
One, I use an expression when you’re approaching the problem of trim tab. And this expression, trim tab, is the little rudder on a boat that when you change it, it changes the whole system. So the first thing I ask a global world changer is, what one policy or one rule, if you change this one, it would change the whole direction of the ship? And that really helps us focus on where we’re going to go in.
The second thing that I often say as we’re playing this strategy out, I suggest that you embrace the status quo to change the system. In the mid-‘90s I debated gay marriage. Now what was interesting at that time was that even the gay community criticized me for pushing an issue that was too soon. "Don’t talk about it, it’s too early." All my debates were with religious leaders, from Christian right groups in the Republican Parties. And instead of saying, "I want this right. We deserve this right"—that’s a change and it sounds like you’re taking something from the system, the conservative system—instead, I talked about love and property rights and kids and being able to go to funerals and inheritance. I talked in the terms of a conservative traditional system. And the folks who debated me—even in the mid-‘90s, which, you know, approval was 20 percent at that time for gay marriage—they basically said, "Well, I can see a case for civil unions." And I thought, "Wow, that’s a huge victory from them."
I also suggest that you ask the system how it can be changed. So, very often if I’m doing a policy challenge, I’ll go right to the bureaucrat and say, "I want to change this system. How would I do it?" And they'd give me a strategy I would have never come up with in my most wild fantasies. They’ll say, "Sally really does that, but Kim is the one to talk to, but Bill has the power. Talk to these people and they can do it." Even people who have disagreed with the system change that I’m suggesting have given me really wonderful strategies. So you might consider just asking.
Another thing you might want to do as you’re going through this is challenge the system, the people you’re dealing with, challenge them to their better angels. We can get really cynical in working with broken systems and bureaucracies. Every success that I’ve had in changing a system is at some point I’ve said to somebody, "Look, you know this is the right thing to do, and this is why you’re really here. It’s not going to help you politically, it’s not going to get you any votes, it’s not going to get you any money, but you as a person, will you help me in changing this thing?" And invariably people really rise up to do that.
And the final thing . . . Everyday the path toward world change will change. Somewhere you’re working with an elected official who will lose office. The news will shift. Very often the social entrepreneur will give up and say, "Wow, I spent so much time working on that person." And I always suggest, keep your eyes on the prize. What was your goal? Sometimes the loss of that person or the shift in the world will speed you to your goal. You must hold on and be tenacious.
So those are the five areas that I usually work with when I create a strategy for an individual or an organization. I think it can be applied to you as a person who are thinking about being a world changer.
Directed / Produced by
Jonathan Fowler & Elizabeth Rodd
Once a week.
Subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
Using machine-learning technology, the genealogy company My Heritage enables users to animate static images of their relatives.
- Deep Nostalgia uses machine learning to animate static images.
- The AI can animate images by "looking" at a single facial image, and the animations include movements such as blinking, smiling and head tilting.
- As deepfake technology becomes increasingly sophisticated, some are concerned about how bad actors might abuse the technology to manipulate the pubic.
My Heritage/Deep Nostalgia<p>But that's not to say the animations are perfect. As with most deep-fake technology, there's still an uncanny air to the images, with some of the facial movements appearing slightly unnatural. What's more, Deep Nostalgia is only able to create deepfakes of one person's face from the neck up, so you couldn't use it to animate group photos, or photos of people doing any sort of physical activity.</p>
My Heritage/Deep Nostalgia<p>But for a free deep-fake service, Deep Nostalgia is pretty impressive, especially considering you can use it to create deepfakes of <em>any </em>face, human or not. </p>
How long should one wait until an idea like string theory, seductive as it may be, is deemed unrealistic?
- How far should we defend an idea in the face of contrarian evidence?
- Who decides when it's time to abandon an idea and deem it wrong?
- Science carries within it its seeds from ancient Greece, including certain prejudices of how reality should or shouldn't be.
Plato used the allegory of the cave to explain that what humans see and experience is not the true reality.
Credit: Gothika via Wikimedia Commons CC 4.0<p>When scientists and mathematicians use the term <em>Platonic worldview</em>, that's what they mean in general: The unbound capacity of reason to unlock the secrets of creation, one by one. Einstein, for one, was a believer, preaching the fundamental reasonableness of nature; no weird unexplainable stuff, like a god that plays dice—his tongue-in-cheek critique of the belief that the unpredictability of the quantum world was truly fundamental to nature and not just a shortcoming of our current understanding. Despite his strong belief in such underlying order, Einstein recognized the imperfection of human knowledge: "What I see of Nature is a magnificent structure that we can comprehend only very imperfectly, and that must fill a thinking person with a feeling of humility." (Quoted by Dukas and Hoffmann in <em>Albert Einstein, The Human Side: Glimpses from His Archives</em> (1979), 39.)</p> <p>Einstein embodies the tension between these two clashing worldviews, a tension that is still very much with us today: On the one hand, the Platonic ideology that the fundamental stuff of reality is logical and understandable to the human mind, and, on the other, the acknowledgment that our reasoning has limitations, that our tools have limitations and thus that to reach some sort of final or complete understanding of the material world is nothing but an impossible, <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01K2JTGIA?tag=bigthink00-20&linkCode=ogi&th=1&psc=1" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">semi-religious dream</a>.</p>
A physicist creates an AI algorithm that predicts natural events and may prove the simulation hypothesis.
- Princeton physicist Hong Qin creates an AI algorithm that can predict planetary orbits.
- The scientist partially based his work on the hypothesis which believes reality is a simulation.
- The algorithm is being adapted to predict behavior of plasma and can be used on other natural phenomena.
Physicist Hong Qin with images of planetary orbits and computer code.
Credit: Elle Starkman
Are we living in a simulation? | Bill Nye, Joscha Bach, Donald Hoffman | Big Think<span style="display:block;position:relative;padding-top:56.25%;" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="4dbe18924f2f42eef5669e67f405b52e"><iframe type="lazy-iframe" data-runner-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/KDcNVZjaNSU?rel=0" width="100%" height="auto" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;"></iframe></span>
The vaccine will shorten the "shedding" time.