Anxious Eagle, Rising Dragon

Most commentary on U.S.-China relations understandably focuses on the challenges that a rising China poses to America’s superpower position and the incentives that America has to prevent China from displacing it.  But what about the challenges that a weak China poses to America and the possibility that China may not be all that enthused about America’s growing inability to underpin the international system? Bill Clinton addressed the former in a speech to the U.S. Institute of Peace 13 years ago:

[T]he weaknesses of great nations can pose as big a challenge to America as their strengths.  So as we focus on the potential challenge that a strong China could present to the United States in the future, let us not forget the risk of a weak China, beset by internal conflicts, social dislocation and criminal activity, becoming a vast zone of instability in Asia….while we cannot know where China is heading for sure, the forces pulling China toward integration and openness are more powerful today than ever before.  And these are the only forces that can make China a truly successful power, meeting the demands of its people and exercising appropriate and positive influence in the larger world in the 21st century.  Such a China would indeed be stronger, but it also would be more at peace with itself and at ease with its neighbors.

Given China’s centrality in the global economy—it accounted for 10% of gross world product (GWP) last year [1]—the dangers that President Clinton outlined are even more important to consider today.

And here’s Zbigniew Brzezinski on China’s desire to see a gradual, relative American decline, not an absolute, precipitous one: China “prudently accepts the existing international system, even if it does not view the prevailing hierarchy as permanent.  It recognizes that success depends not on the system’s dramatic collapse but on its evolution toward a gradual redistribution of power.  Moreover, the basic reality is that China is not yet ready to assume in full America’s role in the world.”

If only Clinton and Brzezinski’s judgments played a greater role in shaping how the U.S. and China assess each other’s strategic positions.  The global financial crisis has led Chinese observers to overstate American decline (although developments of this year suggest that China’s “triumphalism [is], at best, premature, and perhaps seriously misguided”).  For their part, American observers tend to exaggerate China’s strengths as well as its weaknesses.  This duality reflects, on the one hand, a fear of what China will do with its growing clout; and, on the other, a conclusion—perhaps even a hope—that China’s breathtaking ascent will prove to be ephemeral, like Japan’s two decades earlier.  

Those who question the China hype point to the uprisings in the Middle East and North Africa, which demonstrated that even those authoritarian regimes that seem to be stable cannot take their rule for granted; the fallout from Bo Xilai’s ouster, which has widely been characterized as the most serious threat to the Chinese Communist Party since 1989; and a stream of disappointing economic data from China last week, which has revived fears of a hard landing there.  Without downplaying the significance of these challenges, it’s important to appreciate that China has faced far more serious ones.  Just consider a few of the disastrous episodes that it has overcome in the past 150 years:

  • The Taiping Civil War of 1851-64 killed at least 20 million Chinese, roughly 5% of China’s population at the time.  America’s civil war, by contrast, killed about 2% of its population. 
  • The collapse of the Qing Dynasty in 1911 plunged China into chaos and warlordism for nearly four decades.
  • The Great Famine of 1958-61 killed some 30-40 million Chinese and caused China’s economy to contract by nearly a fifth. [2]
  • The Cultural Revolution, which began soon thereafter, plunged the country into chaos for another decade.   
  • If it can recover from such upheavals, it can probably endure through its current difficulties, however many hiccups and setbacks it experiences along the way.  In short: China isn’t going anywhere.  Nor is America.  The drama of the day, the week, and the month—even the year—shouldn’t obscure a basic reality: America and China are, and will likely long remain, the anchors of the international system.  

    [1] According to the CIA World Factbook, GWP last year was $70.16 trillion, and China’s GDP was $6.989 trillion (both numbers at official exchange rates).

    [2] According to the late Angus Maddison’s data, China’s GDP decreased from $451 million in 1958 to $365 million in 1961. 

    Follow Ali Wyne on Twitter and Facebook.

    Photo Credit: Lightspring/

    ​There are two kinds of failure – but only one is honorable

    Malcolm Gladwell teaches "Get over yourself and get to work" for Big Think Edge.

    Big Think Edge
    • Learn to recognize failure and know the big difference between panicking and choking.
    • At Big Think Edge, Malcolm Gladwell teaches how to check your inner critic and get clear on what failure is.
    • Subscribe to Big Think Edge before we launch on March 30 to get 20% off monthly and annual memberships.
    Keep reading Show less

    Is this why time speeds up as we age?

    We take fewer mental pictures per second.

    (MPH Photos/giphy/yShutterstock/Big Think)
    Mind & Brain
    • Recent memories run in our brains like sped-up old movies.
    • In childhood, we capture images in our memory much more quickly.
    • The complexities of grownup neural pathways are no match for the direct routes of young brains.
    Keep reading Show less

    In Switzerland, gun ownership is high but mass shootings are low. Why?

    In the face of seemingly unstoppable gun violence, Americans could stand to gain by looking to the Swiss.

    Politics & Current Affairs
    • According to a recent study, the U.S. had the second highest number of gun-related deaths in 2016 after Brazil.
    • Like the U.S., Switzerland has a high rate of gun ownership. However, it has a considerably lower rate of deaths from gun violence.
    • Though pro-gun advocates point to Switzerland as an example of how gun ownership doesn't have to correlate with mass shootings, Switzerland has very different regulations, practices, and policies related to guns than America.
    Keep reading Show less

    Why are so many objects in space shaped like discs?

    It's one of the most consistent patterns in the unviverse. What causes it?

    • Spinning discs are everywhere – just look at our solar system, the rings of Saturn, and all the spiral galaxies in the universe.
    • Spinning discs are the result of two things: The force of gravity and a phenomenon in physics called the conservation of angular momentum.
    • Gravity brings matter together; the closer the matter gets, the more it accelerates – much like an ice skater who spins faster and faster the closer their arms get to their body. Then, this spinning cloud collapses due to up and down and diagonal collisions that cancel each other out until the only motion they have in common is the spin – and voila: A flat disc.