How does Buddhism fundamentally differ from the Judeo-Christian religions?

Kadam Morten: Buddha said, “There is no creator other than mind.”  So rather than talking about who created the world, it’s actually more pragmatic, more practical, more relevant, to actually ask yourself who created your world.  So, for example, like this talk, you know, my answering this question . . . Everybody who hears this is going to hear it in a different way.  So you’re going to hear it in your way, I’m hearing it in my way, and whoever, you know, is watching this, is hearing it in their own individual way.  So the question then comes up, well, where is the talk?  Where is the answer?  And actually we have to say, then, there is no answer outside of the perception of the answer.  The answer is always linked to an individual perceiver.  And so from that point of view, everybody is experiencing their own answer.  

So similarly, you know, everyone is having their own view of me right now.  Each one of you is experiencing me uniquely.  Therefore, the “me” that you are experiencing is not outside your mind.  So from that point of view, who created me for you?  And the answer is, you did, because I’m not outside your mind.  

So if that’s true for me, it’s actually true for the world.  Your world is a reflection of your mind.  And really, that’s the only world, so to speak, that’s relevant because that’s the one that you can do something about.  And this answer is actually tremendously optimistic because what it does is it puts us into a vital relationship with our environment, with our world, with our relationships, where we begin to recognize how I experience the world depends on how I view the world, how I see the world.

And so if I change my mind, I actually change my world.  Like, if I have a lot of anger in my mind, the world that I perceive is a world full of conflict and, you know, irritating people and stuff like that.  Whereas, if I have a lot of love in my heart, then the world that I perceive is completely different.  It’s a beautiful world and it’s full of attractive people and, you know, a place of love and kindness.  So, it shows that if we work at changing our mind, we can change our world.

Directed / Produced by
Jonathan Fowler & Elizabeth Rodd

Plants have awareness and intelligence, argue scientists

Research in plant neurobiology shows that plants have senses, intelligence and emotions.

Getty Images
Surprising Science
  • The field of plant neurobiology studies the complex behavior of plants.
  • Plants were found to have 15-20 senses, including many like humans.
  • Some argue that plants may have awareness and intelligence, while detractors persist.
Keep reading Show less

Human extinction! Don't panic; think about it like a philosopher.

Most people think human extinction would be bad. These people aren't philosophers.

Shutterstock
Politics & Current Affairs
  • A new opinion piece in The New York Times argues that humanity is so horrible to other forms of life that our extinction wouldn't be all that bad, morally speaking.
  • The author, Dr. Todd May, is a philosopher who is known for advising the writers of The Good Place.
  • The idea of human extinction is a big one, with lots of disagreement on its moral value.
Keep reading Show less

Space is dead: A challenge to the standard model of quantum mechanics

Since the idea of locality is dead, space itself may not be an aloof vacuum: Something welds things together, even at great distances.

Videos
  • Realists believe that there is an exactly understandable way the world is — one that describes processes independent of our intervention. Anti-realists, however, believe realism is too ambitious — too hard. They believe we pragmatically describe our interactions with nature — not truths that are independent of us.
  • In nature, properties of Particle B may depend on what we choose to measure or manipulate with Particle A, even at great distances.
  • In quantum mechanics, there is no explanation for this. "It just comes out that way," says Smolin. Realists struggle with this because it would imply certain things can travel faster than light, which still seems improbable.
Keep reading Show less