What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more

Can we predict recidivism with a brain scan?

March 31, 2013, 12:00 AM

Could monitoring the activity of a brain region called the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) help law enforcement officials predict which violent criminals are likely to re-offend?  A recent study out of the Mind Research Network says maybe so.

Kent Kiehl, an associate professor of psychology at the University of New Mexico, and colleagues examined nearly 100 adult male criminal offenders.  Each study participant had their brain scanned while doing a number of different cognitive tests--and was followed up to four years after being released from prison.

Kiehl and colleagues found that study participants who later found themselves back on the wrong side of the law were much more likely to have lower activity in the ACC than those who managed play it straight. 

The ACC has been linked to a wide variety of interesting behaviors including conflict monitoring, avoidance learning, inhibition and error processing.  So Kiehl argues that re-offenders may simply have greater difficulty inhibiting impulsive and bad behavior.  In response to the results, some have suggested that ACC monitoring can help law enforcement predict which perps are more likely to re-offend, refining the criminal justice system.  Kiehl, on the other hand, is interested in developing treatments that target the ACC and may help criminals stay on the straight and narrow.

There have been a lot of studies like this in the past decade--and, to be honest, they worry me.  They are released to big headlines and big promises.  Frankly, I'm not sure they can deliver--at least in the way we think they should.  (Civil confinement laws, anyone?)  First of all, 96 participants is large for an fMRI study, I'll admit.  But what kind of ACC activity might we see in 96 random non-criminals?  Perhaps the same kinds of patterns--it's hard to know.  Environment is also important.  Sociology and psychology studies have also shown how important environment is to re-offending.  If you find yourself back in the same neighborhood, with the same criminal crew, you have a high chance of re-offending whether your ACC gets a lot of blood flow or not.  And, then, of course, just because someone hasn't been arrested again doesn't mean they haven't re-offended.  This is an important point.  It's possible that many of the participants that showed higher ACC activity are simply better at not getting caught.  With so many factors at play, determining what is behind this difference in ACC activation is a tricky thing at best.

Studies like these provide a lot more questions than answers for me.  And I don't think we should be giving them much weight.  At least not at this stage.

What do you think?  Can we really predict something as complex as recidivism using a brain scan? 

Photo credit:  BortN66/Shutterstock.com

----------Did you know that DIRTY MINDS has be re-titled in paperback as THIS IS YOUR BRAIN ON SEX: THE SCIENCE BEHIND THE SEARCH FOR LOVE?  You can now find it at major booksellers everywhere.


Can we predict recidivism w...

Newsletter: Share: