What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close

The New Tao of Leadership (with John Maeda)

October 12, 2012, 12:00 AM
Tao

What's the Big Idea? 

The Tao de Ching, that 2400 year old leadership bestseller, paints a picture of effective leadership that contrasts strongly with the Western idea of the Alpha boss. In place of decisive action, it recommends listening. In place of “a backbone,” it counsels flexibility and adaptability. It recommends that the leader, like the Tao (translated as way, path, or principle) be a kind of vessel whose receptivity allows a nation to become itself. 

While this approach to leadership may find sympathy with contemporary Westerners uncomfortable with traditional authority, and while many successful CEOs (John Mackey of Whole Foods, for example) have assimilated some of its core concepts, the Tao Te Ching’s message is likely to strike anyone who has ever run a school, a business, or even a family as a bit simplistic. Sometimes leaders have to make painful decisions. Sometimes a parent just has to say “no.”  
At the same time, the purely authoritarian approach, which has fallen out of favor in the US since the social revolutions of the late 1960s, has been rightly critiqued as a good way to stifle innovation and organizational adaptability. It seems clear that the ideal leader falls somewhere in between Lao Tzu and Father Knows Best. 

If you’re an artist struggling with the transition to leadership, John Maeda, president of the Rhode Island School of Design, feels your pain. Creatives in particular, he says, struggle with authority. They don’t want to be “the Man” (or “the Woman,” for that matter) because they conflate authority with authoritarianism. His own journey, from computer programmer to artist/designer to leader of one of the most prestigious learning institutions in the world has convinced him that leaders can and need to wear both hats – that of the inspiring encourager and that of the tough boss. 

VIDEO: John Maeda on Creative Leadership

What's the Significance? 

For Maeda, learning to be a creative leader has been a process of experimentation within these two roles, leading to a balance that enables him to be tough and also to be nurturing, depending on what the moment and the audience demands. 

There’s an unfortunate American cultural tendency to distrust this kind of multimodal approach. We want people to “be what they are,” and especially demand this from our leaders. What Maeda is saying is that most of us are much more complex than we give ourselves credit for. That we tend to restrict ourselves unnecessarily – and sometimes harmfully – to one very narrow end of our personal range. Typically we do this to maintain a sense of personal integrity, but it can have the opposite effect of making us uncomfortable in our own skin when faced with a situation (like leadership) that doesn’t fit our predetermined self-image. 

Reluctant leaders, says Maeda, need to “man” or “woman” up. They need to take the reins of power and learn to be decisive when decisiveness is called for. Overly traditional, authoritarian leaders, on the other hand – especially those tasked with spurring innovation or managing creatives – could benefit from spending more time out of the executive chair, listening to those they lead. Whatever your starting place, the result is likely to be the same: a more complete you, and the true, balanced leadership your organization needs. 

Follow Jason Gots (@jgots) on Twitter

 

 

The New Tao of Leadership (...

Newsletter: Share: