What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more

Gingrich vs. Paul?

December 14, 2011, 12:59 PM

As the astute Ross Douthat points out, the race in Iowa is now between Gingrich and Paul

Right now, the polls show Paul to be in second place, with Romney still fading and everyone else having almost disappeared.

But Gingrich's support is soft and ambivalent, while Paul's is enthusiastic and unwavering. Gingrich isn't organized in Iowa or anywhere else.  His surge depends entirely on his professorial excellence in debating and the sense that he's now the most plausible alternative to Romney.

Paul is highly organized in Iowa, and his effort in the state has been disciplined and very personal.

Everyone knows that intensity of support and organization in caucus states are the keys.  The turnout, even when relatively high, is much lower than that in primary states. Supporters have to be motivated and encouraged to show up for the long and boring meetings.

In Iowa (and many other states, of course), the most motivated Republicans are disproportionally evangelical and at least friendly to the notorious Tea Party.

Neither Paul nor Gingrich is exactly their kind of guy, although both seem preferable to Romney.  They do well in talking for personal freedom and against intrusive government.  They both seem more principled than flip-floppy Mitt.

Lots of Republicans (and, I think, the sensible ones) don't think either Paul or Gingrich has any business being president.  Both lack the qualities associated with statesmanship or just executive competence.  Paul is completely lacking in executive experience, and Newt's quasi-executive performance as speaker doesn't inspire confidence.  And then, as Paul constantly points out, there's the issue of how Newt has made his living over the last decade.

Paul's foreign policy is dangerously utopian in its promiscuous advocacy of military downsizing and American withdrawal.  Gingrich's blowhard comments about, for example, Palestine being a merely invented country aren't what a president, looking out for the true interests of Israel, would say. But Paul, the fear is, would cut Israel off altogether.

Those thinking that the nomination of Newt would be a disaster are rooting for Paul in Iowa, in the hopes of denying him the perhaps irresistible momentum that would come from a victory.  They really don't think that Paul's victory there would be followed up by any others.  They're rooting for man who has no business being nominatedand won't beover another man who has no business being nominatedbut might be.

But it's unclear, in truth, what happens if and when Paul wins in Iowa.  The Republicans, in general, are in an anyone but Romney mood.  

The present nominating process makes it quite difficultif not quite impossiblefor a new candidate to enter the race this late.


Gingrich vs. Paul?

Newsletter: Share: