What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more

Designer Babies: A Dangerous Middle-Class Dream? Or the Way to Perfectly Equal Opportunity for Every Person?

February 20, 2011, 11:50 AM

So the BIG THINKers have reminded us that one of the most personal and technologically promising ideas of our time is DESIGNING BABIES--or making the result of our reproduction better than natural.

I've had a lot to say on this prospect over the years.  For now, I'll raise some considerations based on my previous post on being middle class.  There, I claimed that the middle-class standard of autonomy has at least a strong propensity to give way to the middle-class standard of productivity.  So the middle-class view of liberty is unsustainable over the long-term.

The first BIG THINK thought, after all, is that we have to design babies just to be able to keep up with our increasingly productive Chinese (well, not only Chinese) competition.  Investing in enhanced babies might well be more basic than all those "Sputnik moment" initiatives the president put forward in his recent State of the Union.

We might easily be led to think that our kids aren't worth enough unenhanced to be dignified.  And who could be against increasing a person's productivity--which surely allows that person to more effectively fend off the various risk factors that imperil his or her very existence? 

So surely there's a moral imperative to improve upon nature with productivity--rooted, first of all, in enhanced personal cleverness--in mind.  And wouldn't enhancement even up the inequalities nature now sticks us with?  Wouldn't they "level the playing field," guaranteeing that the competition that is life be based on personal merit and not the arbitariness of natural endowment?  Wouldn't they, from one view, make the meritocratic competition that is middle-class life both more fair and more ruthless than ever? 

All this assumes, of course, that every single enhancement would be available to everyone.  But that assumption might be pretty safe.  Libertarians now say that they, in freedom, own the advantages nature has given them.  But what if they could buy themselves into even greater inequality?  That would deny and credibility at all to our great Declaration's proposition that all men are created equal.

So if you think about it:  Not only must we insure that all babies can be artificially or biotechnologically enhanced, they all must be enhanced.  We can't be pro-choice about enhancement.  Productivity is going to trump genuine autonomy, as we make all our kids into what David Brooks called Achievatrons.

What about those people who object to reproduction through the implantation of tricked-up embryos? What about those people who want to reproduce the old-fashioned way?  That is, by having unprotected sex and then hoping and praying for the best and even being lovingly open to the gift of, say, a Down syndrome son or daughter.

Surely it would be a quite unncessary risk factor--and offense against the new standard of equality by design--to have all those stupid and disease-ridden Mormon and Catholic kids running around?

Lot's more to say...But I hoped I ticked you off enough already.




Designer Babies: A Dangero...

Newsletter: Share: