What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more

How Wisconsin Republicans Respond to Their Critics

March 26, 2011, 12:55 PM

A couple of days ago, I wrote about an op-ed William Cronon wrote in The New York Times arguing that by attempting to strip public unions of their bargaining rights, Wisconsin Republicans “are seeking to reverse civic traditions that for more than a century have been among the most celebrated achievements not just of their state, but of their own party as well.” Cronon also published a blog post suggesting that a conservative group called The American Legislative Exchange Council—which I have written about here—is behind the push to eliminate collective bargaining rights in Wisconsin.

Shortly afterward, the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where Cronon is a professor of history, geography, and environmental studies, received a request under the state’s Open Records Law from the Wisconsin Republican Party for copies of any e-mails sent from Cronon’s university e-mail account which either use keywords like “AFCSME,” “collective bargaining,” “rally,” and “union,” or the names of a number of Wisconsin political figures. Cronon speculates that the state Republicans are hoping to show that he’s a “liberal activist” who is using his state e-mail account “to engage in illegal lobbying and efforts to influence elections.”

As Cronon tells Greg Sargent, these are “McCarthyite tactics.” As my fellow Big Think blogger Kris Broughton writes, they amount to little more than a witch hunt. The Wisconsin Republican party is demanding to see all Cronon’s professional correspondance—including confidential e-mails to his students—without any apparent reason to think he has done anything wrong. Mark Jefferson, the executive director of the Wisconsin Republican Party responded to criticism of their actions by explaining that the party “does not have to give a reason” for making an open records request and saying he finds the attempts to “intimidate” the party from making such requests “chilling.”

Whether or not the request is legal—among other things, it may run afoul of The Family Educational Right to Privacy Act (FERPA), which makes it illegal for universities to release student records without the permission of the students themselves—criticism of the request by a university professor hardly amounts to “intimidation.” It’s not clear that the fact that Cronon works at a public university really should really open up the details of his research or teaching to public scrutiny in the absence of any reason to believe he has done anything wrong. Nor is it clear that political parties should be combing through employee records to harass their critics. If anything, it's the party's request that's really chilling.

What are the Wisconsin Republicans thinking, anyway? They already face nationally-funded recall drives. They are not going to be able to do much to quash Cronon’s criticism of them by smearing him. Instead, this petty bullying has kept his remarks—and the state party’s controversial tactics—in the news.

UPDATE: The New York Times ran an editorial yesterday condemning the Wisconsin Republican Party's actions as "vengeful and ridiculous." And Tenured Radical adds this in response to the Republican Party's complaints about being intimidated, "I hate it when the big, bad history pwofessors aftah the eeny-weenie iddle politicians. Pick on someone your own size next time, ok?"


How Wisconsin Republicans R...

Newsletter: Share: