What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close

Rebuttal to John Horgan's Response to my Recent WSJ Opinion Editorial -- The 'God Particle' and the Origins of the Universe

December 24, 2011, 11:07 PM
Higgs_boson_lhc_unifying_theory_of_the_universe_wsj_cern_einstein_god_particle_big_think_floating_university_scitechfb_science_technology_michio_kaku_mk_mkaku_kaku_media

Last week, The Wall Street Journal published my opinion editorial, "The 'God Particle' and the Origins of the Universe - The search for a unifying theory is nowhere near over." Subscribers to the online edition of the Wall Street Journal are able to read the original editorial by visiting http://on.wsj.com/sO8uwe

In response to my WSJ op-ed, John Horgan (Science journalist and Director of the Center for Science Writings at Stevens Institute of Technology) posted an article on his Scientific American blog -- Cross-Check.

Read the Scientific American Cross-Check blog entry: Does the “Goddamn” Higgs Particle Portend the End of Physics?

My rebuttal to John Horgan's Cross-Check blog entry on Scientific American is as follows:

John Horgan, in his essay, does what he does best, acting as an agent provocateur, throwing flames in all directions, and hoping that some of them may start a fire. In the process, he raises both real and thoughtful scientific questions.

First, he says that the Higgs boson has been over hyped. This is true, but this is not the fault of physicists. We send out press releases, praying that some of them might make it into the papers, only to find that 99.9% of them are totally ignored. And when the media picks up something, it is because of some quirky angle (e.g. calling the Higgs boson the "God particle," a rash decision made by a book editor). So, blame the rating-obsessed media, not physicists, for this distorted picture of how science is done. (Given the almost to total lack of science coverage in the national media, it's no wonder that young people, who are our future, are ignoring science. So I believe that even distorted publicity concerning science is better than none.) 

Second, he says that an accelerator the size of the Milky Way galaxy is needed to verify exotic theories like string theory - This is not true. Almost all advanced science is done indirectly, not directly. We know that the sun is made mainly of hydrogen, not because we have visited the sun or scooped up some sun material, but because we have analyzed sunlight using prisms from a distance. Similarly, we look for indirect clues to test theories beyond the Standard Model, such as finding evidence of "sparticles" (higher vibrations of the string) which may explain the presence of dark matter, or creating gravity-wave detectors in deep space which may detect evidence of radiation from before the Big Bang, or finding experimental deviations from Newton's inverse square law which may prove the existence of parallel universes. 

Third, he says that perhaps nature does not believe in unification. This might be true, but is highly unlikely. For example, it is astounding that all known physical laws, from expanding universes to colliding sub-atomic particles, can be summarized on a single sheet of paper, containing the mathematical equations of general relativity and the Standard Model.

In fact, the sum total of all physical knowledge obtained in the last 2,000 years can be described in the language of unification. This is powerful testament to the power of unification. It would seem bizarre if nature did not take the last step, and unite these two sets of equations. Ultimately, there is no way of definitely knowing if nature prefers a final unification of all physical laws.

However, as Eisenhower once said -- "Pessimism Never Won a War." Optimists (not flame throwers) ultimately are the makers of history.

-- Additional Links & Resources:

Visit The University of Edinburgh School of Physics and Astronomy website to learn more about Peter Higgs and the Higgs Mechanism

The above page also includes links to external resources that may be of interest:

 

Rebuttal to John Horgan's R...

Newsletter: Share: