What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more

Will The National Enquirer Win a Pulitzer?

February 18, 2010, 8:16 PM

Today The Huffington Post reports that The National Enquirer will be considered for the 2010 Pulitzer Prize for journalism in the categories of Investigative Reporting and National News Reporting for its coverage of John Edward’s infidelity scandal during his presidential campaign of 2007 and 2008. The Enquirer has broken several stories ahead of the more legitimate press, such as Rush Limbaugh’s drug abuse, because unlike other sources, The Enquirer will pay for information. Should the Pulitzer committee award the Enquirer for its coverage of John Edwards, it should also censure the paper for its reporting methods and publication style.

There is little doubt that the honesty of a man running for public office, particularly for the Office of the President, is information vital to the public good. But if The Enquirer broke its story during the Edwards campaign, which it did, why didn’t other media outlets follow suit?

I am reminded of my mother and the time she told me the story of the boy who cried “Wolf!”. At the time I learned one reason not to tell lies is that there will come a time when nobody believes you and when you have a truth that is worth telling, for example that you or your flock of sheep are being gobbled up by wolves, people will laugh and say, “Oh, that boy. He works for a cheap grocery store tabloid that pays people to gossip about celebrities and prays on the misfortune of others in their most private and human of moments, and most of the time it’s false anyway. No, you can’t trust that boy.”

Well, perhaps I have not remembered the story exactly as my mother told it, but the notion that The Enquirer should be rewarded for getting one in a hundred stories right, but nobody realizing it at the time it was relevant because its history as a news source is laughably unreliable…well, mother would not approve.


Will The National Enquirer ...

Newsletter: Share: