What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close
With rendition switcher

Transcript

Daniel Koretz:


In fact, the level of pressure from the federal government now and secondhand from the state governments that are responsible for imposing the federal policy if they take federal money is so strong that it leaves people no room for experimentation.  If a teacher is desperate to raise scores by a very large amount every single year, and the principal, likewise, feels the same pressure, it’s virtually impossible for them to say, “Well, let’s try a few new ways of teaching 4th Grade Math and see what works best for our kids.”  They can’t afford to do that.  States, likewise, feel that they can’t afford to do it, so we’ve created an environment where local innovation is very hard, at least, local innovations that I would want to see.  And, therefore, we have no chance to do what engineers would tell us to do, which is try a bunch of things and evaluate them very, very carefully.  I’ve argued…  I [argued] last year when the first attempt to reauthorize No Child Left Behind failed, that the new law should create a space for research and development.  State should be allowed waivers from the arbitrary requirements in return for trying new things and doing serious independent evaluations of those, making the results of those evaluations publicly known.  That would allow us in the next cycle, 5 or 6 or 7 years later, to have some hard evidence that schools could use in deciding what to do.

 

Daniel Koretz on Improving ...

Newsletter: Share: