What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close

So Much for Evolution? Or Evolution Is Getting Personal?

February 16, 2011, 9:30 AM
Peter2

1.  According to our really cool BIG THINK physicist, Michio Kaku, evolution has stopped for our species.

2. But that doesn't mean we can't change ourselves.

3. So, in the case of our species, impersonal natural evolution has been displaced by conscious and volitional evolution.

4. Natural evolution is with the flourishing of the species in mind.  Each particular member of the species is, in effect, species fodder.  That means, for example, that social mammals such as ourselves should find our fulfillment in fulfilling our desires as social animals.  But we aren't completely satisfied by that instinctual satisfaction, because we can't lose ourselves in some social or natural whole.  We know, it seems, that each of us is dissed by being reduced to a part of some whole. Have we become less social, in that sense, over time?

5. Conscious and volitional evolution is not with the species--but with ME--in mind.  My objection to nature is its indifference to my personal existence.  Nature is out to kill ME--take ME out--once I've done my social duty.

6. But I refuse to give in, I want to stay around.  So I'm working hard to indefinitely perpetuate my own existence against nature's intention.  And that's the point of all technological and biotechnological progress (against nature), as the transhumanists most emphatically point out. It's not nature, but US, that produces change we can believe in.

7. The unself-conscious, non-technological, non-personal animals are fine with living according to nature. 

8. And so we might want to say that the theory of evolution was completely true until our species--the being with infinitely complex language open to the truth about being and one's own being--showed up.

9. Or: Animals smart enough to discover the theory of evolution are bound to exhibit plenty of behavior that would prove it's not completely true--and getting less true, as we imposed our personal will on the whole planet (and maybe [who knows?] more and more of the cosmos).

I actually don't completely believe the above.  But tell me why I shouldn't.

 

So Much for Evolution? Or ...

Newsletter: Share: