What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close

Jimmy Carter (More Than) Okay with President Romney

April 26, 2012, 12:06 PM
Jimmy-carter-april-25-cropped-proto-custom_28

The most active, often eloquent, and judgmental of our ex-presidents—Jimmy Carter—explains why he would be comfortable with President Mitt Romney:

“I’d rather have a Democrat but I would be comfortable,” the former president told MSNBC in a segment aired Wednesday. “I think Romney has shown in the past, in his previous years as a moderate or progressive… that he was fairly competent as a governor and also running the Olympics as you know.”

Carter went on to compliment Romney, the presumptive Republican nominee, as “a good solid family man and so forth.” And although he said Romney has taken some “extreme right-wing positions” in order to win the GOP primary, he suggested that the former Massachusetts governor is likely something of centrist at heart.

“What he’ll do in the general election, what he’ll do as president I think is different,” Carter said.

Read more here.

Carter’s judgments, if true, aren’t exactly good news for conservatives, who voted for this or that ”not-Romney” in the primaries because they didn’t believe Mitt is authentically one of them.  Jimmy reads Mitt's heart and finds moderation, centrism, and even progressivism there.

Carter, a good and faithful family guy himself, reminds us that both Obama and Romney are distinguished by being fine husbands and fathers and persons of unquestionable personal decency. 

He also reminds us that Romney has proven to be at least “fairly competent” and flexible in his previous executive positions.  He could easily have added that Romney speaks with authority and detailed mastery of public policy.  When even the legendary President Reagan spoke off script, Republicans were forced to cringe on occasion.  And the same is true, of course, with either President Bush.  With Romney, the cringe factor is mighty low (although occasionally he displays a tonedeafness to the downsides of seeming too complacent about being fabulously rich). 

Carter’s judgments have great relevance in the dispute over whether the upcoming election will be a referendum on the incumbent or a deserved repudiation the general repulsiveness of Republicans, their nominee, and their insensitive and fraudulent ideology.  (Chris Mooney even claims there’s a genetic cause for Republicans’ outrageous denials of various scientific facts and the authority of science in general.  From Mooney's view, we need to hope and pray that they discover a cure for being a Republican.) 

If Romney is okay (not suffering from the Republican genetic disorder, for example), then voters are free to make this election what our Framers more or less intended:  The incumbent gets reelected if people are satisfied that his record of accomplishment has made their lives better—more secure, more prosperous, less anxious, more free, and so forth.  If  they aren’t so satisfied, then he should be replaced by a adequate (or maybe better) alternative.

 

Jimmy Carter (More Than) Ok...

Newsletter: Share: