What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close

Two Americas

January 30, 2010, 7:11 PM
800px-homeless_new_york_2008.jpeg

Over the course of 2009, the Dow Jones industrial index grew a healthy 17%. The Nasdaq grew a remarkable 41%. Over the same period the average compensation—the total cost of wages and benefits—for workers in the private sector grew just 1.5%. Adjusted for inflation, American workers made, on average, 1.3% less at the end of year than at the beginning of the year, and just 1.1% more than they did at the end of the last recession in 2001. That is, if they had jobs at all.

Slow wage growth, of course, is great news for the stock market because it keeps corporate costs down. It's also more proof that, as I've argued, the growth in the market shouldn't be confused with improvement in the economic conditions of ordinary Americans. And it puts in perspective the news that the GDP may have grown 5.7%—technically the fastest rate in six years—at the end of 2009. Fully 3.4 percentage points of the increase can be attributed to businesses restocking their inventories, and doesn't represent a real increase in the underlying demand for goods and services. Consumer spending actually grew just 2%, a little down from the previous quarter. And even after last quarter's growth, the GDP is still down 1.9% from it's high in 2008.

When the government stimulus packages run out, consumer spending will have to pick up the slack or the recovery will stall. But consumer spending—and the economy—isn't likely to pick up until wages and employment grow substantially. As Dan Froomkin points out, part of the problem is that not only is the average American worker making less than they were a year ago, but that the financial crisis also wiped out a huge amount of their assets. A Brookings study finds that American households lost $13 trillion in wealth—or about 15% of their net worth—between 2007 and 2009. Since housing prices crashed one in four homeowners have found themselves "under water"—owing more on their mortgages than their houses are worth. And, of course, more than 15 million Americans are out of work, about twice as many as at the end of 2007. Americans simply don't have much money to spend, and aren't likely to for some time.

A large part of the apparent growth in the economy over the last ten years was actually an artifact of the credit and housing bubbles, and not the product of any underlying increase in our productivity. It's probably not a coincidence that over the same period a huge amount of what economic gains there were went to the wealthiest 1% of the population. But in order to pull out of this recession all of us will have to be a part of the recovery.

 

Two Americas

Newsletter: Share: