What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more

Mama Grievance

January 16, 2011, 12:16 PM

Last week, I was sharply critical of the way Sarah Palin handled accusations that she was in some way to blame for the Tucson shooting. It is easy to understand why Palin might be defensive.  As divisive and nasty as her rhetoric can be, she did not deserve the suggestion that she was to blame in any way for the attempted assassination of a Congresswoman and the shooting of 19 other people. But her response—to suggest that she herself was victim of the same kind of false accusation that was used to justify the historical persecution and slaughter of the Jews—was particularly noxious with six people lying dead and Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) in intensive care after taking a bullet to her brain.

As many commentators said, Palin’s response highlighted the difference between her and President Obama, especially in the wake of his widely-admired speech at the memorial service in for victims of the shooting. And it shows why Palin is unlikely to beat Obama if she runs against him in 2012.

It’s not simply that Palin failed to anticipate how people would respond to her use of the term “blood libel”—originally the term for the  slander that Jews used the blood of Christian children in making their matzoh that was used to justify the pogroms—to describe the criticism of her. Nor is it that, as Lindsay Beyerstein pointed out, Palin has herself leveled an absurd, over-the-top charges against Democrats when she accused them of plotting to set up “death panels” that would decide who would live and die—a claim that the Pulitzer-Prize-winning factcheck site Politifact named its “Lie of the Year” for 2010. Nor is it even her incoherent, self-serving claim that the criticism of her did precisely the thing—incite violence—she denied criticism could ever do.

Rather it is that, as Jonathan Martin says, Palin’s response shows she isn’t either interested in or able to ”move beyond her brand of grievance-based politics.” Palin never misses an opportunity to go on the offensive. She never seems to acknowledges even the possibility that she might be at fault. Instead she always doubles down and plays the victim of unfair attacks by establishment politicians and the mainstream media—even when it is ridiculous or in poor taste to do so.

This aggressive unwillingness to compromise or admit fault is a large part of why her supporters adore her so much, and it is always good for keeping her in the headlines. But it is also a large part of why she is so unpopular with moderates and independents. Winning a national election requires knowing when to be conciliatory, as well as when it isn’t appropriate to become the story—skills Obama has, but Palin has so far not shown.


Mama Grievance

Newsletter: Share: