What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close

Ferguson's Decisive Social Mobility

June 23, 2013, 2:39 PM
Social-mobility-cartoon1_(bigthink)

Preeminent Harvard historian Niall Ferguson argues that social mobility is extremely important to any developing or advancing society, and that the degree of social mobility is more important than the degree of inequality.

He reasons that he would much rather live in a society with high-income inequality and high social mobility, than a society with low-income inequality and low social mobility.  A society where somebody can start out flipping burgers, and end up as a CEO is more preferable to a society where some individual will be stuck in the same place their entire lives.

This is the case because, as Ferguson explains, it reflects who we are as human beings.  Our “aptitudes” are not evenly distributed.  When we have kids, we are not having carbon copies of ourselves, so our children will revert to the mean.  Amazing, motivated, driven people, will not necessarily produce children with the same characteristics or level of achievement. However, in the absence of social mobility, these less talented, less driven, and less deserving offspring will still gain access to elite colleges and good jobs, based on their parents talent, income, education and connections, rather their own aptitudes and skill sets.

This happens on the other side of the spectrum as well.  Two less talented or less educated parents can produce highly talented and driven kids. In socially mobile societies, this child would gain access to scholarships and to elite schools like UC Berkeley and Harvard, based on their talent. But this is not happening in our society! We lose all this talent in the bottom fifth of the population.  The development of that talent is the key to an advancing society!

Along with this need for increasing upward social mobility, Ferguson discusses the problem society has today with downward social mobility.  Ferguson states that we “create safety nets so nobody will have to fall too far or too hard.  And we want to take the pain out of competition.”  However, this is how we find who is talented and who is not.  This is how we find who is hardworking and who is not.  This needs to be done all the way from early education, to how chief executives become heads of companies.  If we do this, maybe executives will stop giving themselves bonuses while their firms are going under.

 

 

Ferguson's Decisive Social ...

Newsletter: Share: