What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more

Why You Still Can't Trust Rating Agencies

January 17, 2012, 3:53 PM

Credit-rating agencies were among the bogeymen of the global financial crisis, and for good reason. Moody's, Standard and Poor's, Fitch, and others failed to appraise the real risks of billions of dollars in securities that eventually went bad.  Now, they're trying to act responsible by jumping on the fiscal woes of government borrowers. We still shouldn't trust them.

In the corporate world, there are at least three things wrong with credit-rating agencies.  First, they get paid by the very companies whose securities they rate.  Second, because they can't offer the big bonuses and profits of banks and hedge funds, the agencies don't necessarily have the brightest financial minds on their staff; the people who devise the securities being rated are probably cleverer.  Third, only the opinions of the three major rating agencies seem to matter, and they often engage in a kind of tit-for-tat competition when they should just be focusing on the fundamentals of the securities they're rating.

Rating government bonds isn't necessarily as lucrative for the agencies, but it does give them more clout in the markets.  They've been trying to reassert their relevance by using that clout ever since the global financial crisis began.  Notably, there was last year's downgrade of the United States by Standard and Poor's, complete with a huge mathematical error. Then there were downgrades for European countries, culminating in this week's flurry from Standard and Poor's again.

Some of these downgrades have been puzzling.  For example, Standard and Poor's just lowered Italy's rating (and the ratings of three other countries) by two notches.  The agency's previous downgrade of Italy had occurred in September 2011.  So, was there no reason to make an intermediate move and downgrade Italy by one notch in the intervening four months?  Did the raters just not get around to looking at Italy until now?

It wouldn't be too surprising, given Moody's response to the move by Standard and Poor's. Showing its best competitive spirit, the agency said that it would not be looking at France again until the end of the quarter.  That's more than two months away; does Moody's really think nothing will happen to affect France's credit-worthiness between now and then?  Perhaps - until September, Standard and Poor's main rating of Italy hadn't changed since 2006.

The ratings are filled with puzzling comparisons, too.  Standard and Poor's rating for France, a country harnessed to the euro as if its life depended on it, is now the same as its rating of the United States.Yields on the French government's bonds are about 50 percent higher than those on the Treasury's notes.  Are the markets so wrong, and the ratings agencies so right?

It just doesn't add up.  Yet the media still make much of all the downgrades, even though the moves usually don't change anything in the actual fiscal situations of the countries involved.  It's laziness, really - the news stories practically write themselves from the rating agencies'press releases.  But the media are just playing into the rating agencies' hands, helping a bunch of dinosaurs to maintain some semblance of importance when they should have been fossils long ago.



Why You Still Can't Trust R...

Newsletter: Share: