There have been many different conversations recently about issues and concerns with technology, leadership, and education. See example 1, example 2, example 3, example 4, and example 5. Sorry for the simplicity of the links to those examples but it is past my bedtime:)

 

I think the solution to address those issues in school districts begins with a superintendent who is future thinking, collaborative, and open to the possibilities that exist. I frequently hear from district and school administrators who are overburdened with the complexities and demands of NCLB, reduced funding (for Title programs, among others), and trying to lead learning communities in difficult places. It is easy, and sometimes understandable, for administrators operate out of a myopic vision of the here and now. That of course leads to other problems like the narrowing of the curriculum and throwing the advancement of technology out the window. On paradigms: you see it because you believe it means that you have to get people thinking of the possibilities rather than staying trapped in the problems of today. School districts will not move forward without people beginning to think of the possibilities. Reeves has a point in saying that action drives belief (see previous post) (it is certainly reinforcing) but if you are in a place with no action, complete stagnation,  then you have to begin with beliefs (like finding that hope for the future) or in people's beliefs that there can be a better way.  A solution begins with a superintendent with a broad, deep, compelling vision of what a school district should be all about including and especially technologically. The next part involves leading from the fine line of trying to get everyone on board versus telling everyone what to do. Leading from either extreme will prove fruitless. You can't wait for everyone to get on board in order to create change, but you have to get a critical mass that is willing and excited to move forward in creating a new reality. The task of moving an entire district involves tapping into the passions and ideas of many, many people. That is where the idea of a collaborative plan comes into play. It will take you to systemic reform. That is the type of plan I talked about yesterday.

 

I would love to hear from you:

What leadership paradigms do you think it takes to create change in a school district?  What would you do if you were the superintendent of a school district that has lost its relevance?

 

A final thought (from an earlier post on this site)(I just had to replay this one):

 

If you don't like change, you're going to like irrelevance even less.
                        - US Army Chief of Staff Eric Shinseki

 

 

Posted by Steve Poling.