What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close

Should the Old Masters Give Way to the New Ones?

September 16, 2012, 11:35 PM
Rembrandt_aux_yeux_hagards

Perhaps the one unavoidable fact all museums must face is the reality of limited space. Who stays? Who goes? Most importantly, who makes those decisions? In Germany, these questions have taken on a whole new degree of importance. The Gemäldegalerie—home of Berlin’s most prestigious Old Masters’ collection, with works by Vermeer, Rembrandt, Dürer, Jan van Eyck, Raphael, Titian, Caravaggio, Rubens, and others—faces a move to another, smaller location to make room for the expansion of the Neue Nationalgalerie, where masterpieces by some of the biggest names of 20th century art will be displayed. Germans seem split between those who want their Rembrandt (shown above, in his 1630 etching Self-Portrait with a Cap, Openmouthed) right where he’s been and those who would like to see Germany finally to have a world-class modern art museum. As other museums and countries eventually face this same problem, we’ll all have to ask if the Old Masters should give way to the new ones?

As reported by Charly Wilder in Der Spiegel, German billionaire industrialist Heiner Pietzsch (and his wife Ulla) has been called the “Gemäldegalerie Killer” by the German press. The 82-year-old Pietzsch donated a priceless collection of modern art to the nation on the condition that it be displayed in a museum dedicated to modern art. “Instead of all of this arguing, a decision is indispensible,” Pietzsch responded in an interview about the controversy. “Let's stick to the facts, if the condition that our collection is exhibited in the context of a 20th century museum is not met, we will cancel the donation contract.” If that sounds like an ultimatum, it is. But a large contingent of German art officials claim that a relocation of the Old Masters’ collection was an inevitable decision that Pietzsch’s donation and conditions made more immediate.

The Pietzsch collection is hard to ignore. Max Ernst, René Magritte, Joan Miró, Salvador Dalí, Jackson Pollock, Mark Rothko, Robert Motherwell, Barnett Newman, and Frida Kahlo are just some of the big names featured. The Neue Nationalgalerie already doesn’t have enough room to display their own works by German modern geniuses such as Max Beckmann, Sigmar Polke, and Gerhard Richter, so an expansion is not just desired, but essential if they’re going to serve the viewing public clamoring to see not just German modern art, but the best of international modernism.

German officials are trying desperately to have the best of both worlds—Old and New—but the search for alternative plans will, at best, delay the display of the Pietzsch collection and, at worst, the devastating loss of the donation entirely. But even if the worst-case scenario happens, it will still just delay the inevitable question of what to do with an ever-increasing collection in a never-increasing gallery space.

On one hand, the Old Masters prevail because they’ve stood the test of time. The art of today owes much to that of yesterday. To forget the art of the past would rob future artists of the education generations have enjoyed. But to privilege the past to the exclusion of the present might make art irrelevant to present issues purely through the distance of time. However, we must also avoid the danger of seeing modern art as better than older art based on a belief in progress in the arts. Rothko’s no better than Rembrandt because of chronology and the development of artistic movements, and vice versa. It will be interesting to see how this case plays out in Germany. It might be the first battle in what will be a long war for space on museum walls.

[Image: Rembrandt. Self-Portrait with a Cap, Openmouthed (detail), 1630.]

 

Should the Old Masters Give...

Newsletter: Share: