What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more

Jackson Pollock’s Sculpture: Was “Jack the Dripper” Also “Jack the Chipper”?

October 1, 2012, 11:07 PM

Is there any more famous footage of an artist at work than Hans Namuth’s film of Jackson Pollock? More than half a century after Pollock’s death, the “Jack the Dripper” label still sticks in the public’s imagination. But according to a recent piece by Robin Cembalest in Art News, greater attention is finally being paid to Pollock’s attempts at sculpture. What this reevaluation of the poster boy for Abstract Expressionism might mean remains to be seen, but is it possible that “Jack the Dripper” might also be “Jack the Chipper”?

Cembalest centers the piece on an exhibition at New York’s Matthew Marks Gallery titled Jackson Pollock & Tony Smith: Sculpture, which runs through October 27, 2012. Pollock and Smith, both born in 1912 and celebrating their centennials this year, spent a weekend together in July 1956 making sculpture. The exhibition features just five sculptures—three by Smith and two by Pollock. Smith and Pollock became friends in the 1940s and found common ground in sculpture. Smith the architect really wanted to paint, but found sculpture more suited to his talents. Pollock the world-famous painter enjoyed working on sculpture as a pressure-free medium. Just weeks before Pollock’s death in a car crash, the friends made these sculptures in wire, gauze, and plaster using sand casting to add texture.

Unfortunately, Pollock’s two sculptures really don’t look like anything. If you found them in the rubble of a demolished building, you wouldn’t be able to tell them apart from the debris. Still stuck on the drip technique of his painting, but somehow hoping to translate it into solid, three-dimensional form, Pollock twisted wire to mimic the delicate swirls and twirls of his drip paintings. Looking at these pieces I appreciate even more how Pollock felt trapped by his drip style. The same style that won Pollock fame and fortune confined him to the medium of paint when what he really wanted to do was explore other media. Perhaps he should have sculpted under an assumed name.

Before Abstract Expressionism, Pollock attempted a more psychological, symbolic kind of expressionism in his paintings. A sculpted basalt head Pollock made sometime in the early 1930s (shown above) is currently for sale from Leila Heller Gallery. It’s Pollock before he became “Pollock.” On the bright side, the transition to sculpture seems smoother for this period for Pollock. On the dark side, critics usually view this period of Pollock’s career as a probing prelude to the AbEx years.

In this Pollock birth centennial year, as in any big round number anniversary of a major artist, critics are going to look for previously unturned stones to overturn in search of new perspectives. Artists such as Matisse, Picasso, and Degas all grew in critical estimations in light of their sculpture, but all of those artists were able to complement their painting with sculpture and vice versa. Even a mind-bending style such as Cubism could be adapted from painting to sculpture in a fruitful way. As Cembalest mentions, critics now see the sculpture of Pollock’s contemporary (and rival) Willem de Kooning as another dimension of his work worth studying, so it’s not necessarily Abstract Expressionism that poses a problem, but rather Pollock’s take on it.

Will we ever think of Pollock as “Jack the Chipper,” a sculptor trapped in a painter’s career? I doubt it. Cembalest repeats the story of how Pollock had glacial boulders behind the Long Island home he shared with wife and fellow painter Lee Krasner excavated with an eye towards one day carving them. “One of these days,” Pollock told his wife, “I’ll get back to sculpture.” Getting “back to sculpture” sounds suspiciously like getting “back to nature,” the force that Pollock identified with so powerfully that he barked “I am nature!” once to an interviewer. “I am sculpture!” Pollock might be saying as he stared at the boulders he never carved, knowing that neither statement was true. Being a great, groundbreaking painter, however, is a pretty good consolation prize.

[Image: Jackson Pollock. Untitled, 1930-33. Basalt. Private collection. Courtesy of Leila Heller Gallery.]


Jackson Pollock’s Sculpture...

Newsletter: Share: