What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more

The Debate that Wasn't

June 28, 2012, 4:56 PM

In Yemen, al-Qaeda often makes mistakes that open the group up to criticism. Most of the time this chance goes begging as the Yemeni government, popular clerics and tribal shaykhs neglect to speak out in any sustained fashion against the terrorist group.

I think this is a mistake. My record, I believe, is fairly clear: no single weapon – drones, Special Forces or public discourse – can defeat al-Qaeda on its own. All of these have a place. It is the over-reliance on the military aspect that I believe is misguided.

In the past – following the 2008 suicide attack in Sayyun, the release of Shaykh Muhammad al-Muayyad in 2009 and so on – I have watched in frustration as the Yemeni and US govrnments missed what I felt were excellent opportunities to take back some of the field of public discourse that both had ceded to al-Qaeda.

AQAP’s theology and shifting justifications are shallow and weak, but unchallenged they have an air of authenticity because no one is willing to stand up and expose them for the mishmash of mistaken exegesis and muddled thought that they are.

At the moment there is yet another opportunity for the Yemeni government to attack AQAP’s public messaging (anyone who follows AQAP’s propaganda knows just how sensitive the group is to public perception and I believe this sensitivity is due in large part to what AQAP senses as a vulnerability.)

Early in the spring Saudi’s deputy consul in Aden was kidnapped – whether by AQAP or by enterprising criminal elements is unclear, but what is clear is that he is currently in AQAP’s custody. As a result Saudi has closed its consulates in Sanaa and Aden and an estimated 80,000 umrah seekers have been denied visas to Saudi Arabia.

This, I believe, presents the Yemeni government with an opportunity for a media blitz attacking AQAP and asking why an organization that claims to protect Muslims is carrying out actions that prevent Yemenis from going on umrah. With Ramadan approaching this is only going to become more of an issue. The time to start is now.

This is a debate that needs to be had if for no other reason than AQAP should not remain uncontested in the public sphere.

Obviously such debates won’t on their own defeat AQAP or dry up the ranks of recruits – no single action will do that. There aren’t silver bullets in this war. There are only small steps that over time can have a lasting impact.


The Debate that Wasn't

Newsletter: Share: