What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more

AQAP's Big Dilemma

April 18, 2012, 7:33 PM

Things have been going pretty good for AQAP of late.  The group appears to be gaining recruits both from inside Yemen and abroad and it is taking and holding more territory than ever before, and while there have certainly been setbacks my scorecard for 2012 has AQAP well ahead of the US and Yemen.  But it isn't all good for the terrorist organization. 

Yesterday Saudi Arabia released a tape of former Guantanamo Bay detainee Mishal Muhammad al-Shadukhi speaking to Ali Hamdan, Saudi's ambassador to Yemen.  The subject of their conversation was Abdullah al-Khalidi, the deputy Saudi Consul in Aden, who was kidnapped in March. 

An audio recording of the conversation is here while al-Sharq al-Awsat provides a transcript here, both are in Arabic. 

It isn't clear whether AQAP was responsible for the original kidnapping or - an even more worrisome development - whether a third party kidnapped al-Khalidi and then sold him to AQAP.  The latter bothers me more than the former because it speaks to a general breakdown of law and order in Yemen and suggests that AQAP is well enough integrated on the local scene to be a known entity to criminal elements. 

Regardless of how it happened, the Saudi deputy consul is in AQAP's hands.  And AQAP wants several prisoners released and if that doesn't happen it is prepared to carry out attacks.  (Note: al-Shadukhi claims that he is making the call at the request of Nasir al-Wihayshi - who in my mind continues to be underestimated by people studying AQAP.)

Many, including Robert Powell of the Economist Intelligence Unit, believes that the threats "sound like bluster."  And indeed they may be, although people have underestimated AQAP before and that hasn't worked out well.

Powell also suggest that AQAP usually executes its prisoners - I would disagree with him on this.  And I think this is where AQAP finds itself in a real predicament.  

AQAP has certainly executed individuals it has captured but all of these individuals have been men the organization has accused and - in its own loose court system - convicted of attacking the organization, whether as members of the Yemeni security services or as spies working for the Yemeni or Saudi governments.  

The other group of individuals it has captured have been Yemeni soldiers and AQAP has been very careful not to execute these.  Primarily, because it is waging its own hearts and minds campaign in southern Yemen and it is wary of turning off the population against. 

(There is a lot here, but the short version is that the organization knows that to succeed it needs much more support on the ground, and I think the bin Laden documents when they are released will support my reading.)

For instance following the Battle of Marib in 2009, AQAP released soldiers after getting them to promise they wouldn't attack AQAP anymore.  And it currently holds 73 other soldiers it has captured that it wants to trade for the release of AQAP prisoners in Yemeni jails.  Yemen hasn't budged and I doubt Saudi will either.

So what does this mean for AQAP?  It has only choices: it can execute the deputy consul and risk alienating the broader population it is attempting to win over - remember al-Khalidi isn't a soldier and isn't actively combating AQAP,  it can hold him indefinitely which doesn't get their prisoners out of jail, or it can try to negotiate separately with his family or tribe back in Saudi although how that would benefit the organization is unclear.  

My point in all of this is simply this: as AQAP attempts to play more of a governing and service provider role in Yemen it is more susceptible and has to check some of its actions against public opinion - witness the recent interviews that Ansar al-Shariah keeps putting out featuring citizens giving their opinion of how the group is doing.  

AQAP isn't the wild killing machine other branches of al-Qaeda have been (there is a method to what often appears as madness) and the more the US understands that method the better off it will be able to disrupt and defeat the organization.

But this means that the US can't target AQAP like it has gone after other branches of al-Qaeda, which is the subject of tomorrow's post.   



AQAP's Big Dilemma

Newsletter: Share: