Mark Leonard
Executive Director, European Council on Foreign Relations
03:09

Mark Leonard: Chinese Proverbs

To embed this video, copy this code:

Mark Leonard discusses his most memorable Chinese insights.

Mark Leonard

Mark Leonard is Executive Director of the first pan-European think-tank, the European Council on Foreign Relations. It was launched in late 2007 with backing from the Soros Foundations Network, Fride, the Communitas Foundation, the Sigrid Rausing Trust, and the Unicredit Group.

His first book, Why Europe will run the 21st Century, published in the UK by 4th Estate in February 2005, has been translated into 17 languages. His second book What does China think? will be published later in the year.

Mark writes and broadcasts regularly on international affairs – assignments which have led him to seek out barbecues in Texas, prisoners in Egypt and cutting-edge architecture in China. His work has appeared in publications including The Financial Times, The International Herald Tribune, The Wall Street Journal, The Guardian, The Independent, The Daily Telegraph, Prospect, The Spectator, New Statesman, Foreign Policy, The Washington Quarterly, Country Life, Arena, The Mirror, The Express, and The Sun.

Mark also acts an adviser to companies and governments on China, Middle East Reform, the future of Europe and Public Diplomacy; occassionally collaborating with the Dutch architect Rem Koolhaas to produce work for clients ranging from the European Commission to Prada.

Transcript

Question: What are your most memorable insights from your time in China?


Mark Leonard:
  There are two moments that really made me pause and think about China.  One was on one of my first trips to China.  I was going around talking to lots of Chinese about the relationship between the European Union and China.  And I was asking them what they hoped to get out of an EU China relationship.  And one Chinese academic, an assertive nationalist, said to me, “When China goes to war with the United States, we’d like Europe to remain neutral.”  And that’s what he wanted to get out about the relationship.  Now, that was quite an eye opening moment, because it showed whereas most people in Europe can’t imagine their country in any war other than a kind of war of choice, like in Kosovo, when it
+++ Tape #0:54:00.4  +++
was about protecting the rights of Kosovo’s, war hasn’t been totally taken off the table.  The Chinese are obsessed with avoiding conflict, but the idea of war is still something which is possible, and which they live with as a permanent theme.  And that’s a war of self preservation, which is quite a different sort of mental state to be in.  It’s a wider talking than many Europeans have when they think about the world.  Another really interesting moment was when I came across a debate amongst Chinese people about managing the decline of the West.  We, in the West, obsess about the idea of managing China’s rise, and there is this whole debate about how do we manage China’s rise?  What do we do?  Do we try and engage China?  Do we try and contain them?  And there is a sense in a way that it’s up to us to decide how China rises and what kind of power China’s going to be, rather than something which the Chinese are going to work out, which we’re going to have to deal with.  When I saw Chinese people having the mirror image of that debate, talking about the danger of the West declining too quickly and how that could create real pressures on China, because a lot of good things are actually done by Western dominance, and they’re worrying about what to do about proliferation and how to keep the peace if the U.S. power collapses too quickly as a result of the Iraq War.  And it shows a, that we’re not going to be, you know, that just as we talk about trying to manage China’s rise and we work out how to mold Chinese policy, they’re having exactly the same debates over there and trying to mold our policies and our responses.  And it also showed that the extent to which they’re thinking about a post-American, a post-Western world order.


×