What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close
With rendition switcher

Transcript

Daniel Koretz:

So, for example, in my view, one of the single most important things we have to do is to make teaching a more attractive profession.  There’s a lot of argument about one piece of this, would pay for performance make teaching more or less appealing to the people we want to have teaching.  I think the jury is out on that.  But I think it’s fair to say that, in general, the quality of the teaching force has taken second place in the current round of reforms.  There’s an [edict] that we must somehow have highly qualified teachers everywhere.  But how do we get them?  You have to convince people to do it first and you have to convince them not to leave.  A lot of people leave teaching because they find it very stressful and an unsatisfying role.  So I think we need to go back to square 1 and say… Since we know that American education has some chronic deficiencies, what can we say about the causes of those deficiencies?  What can we say about the impediments that stand in the way of doing better?  And when we don’t know, we ought to go and look.  We ought to go into schools, do hard research to figure out which of the impediments really matter.  And then, craft policies that try to chip away at those impediments.  Instead of doing what we’ve done for 30 years, which we just make it up, make up a policy, drop it on schools and see what happens.  Or more often than not, fail to see what happens because we drop these things into schools without putting in place the kind of monitoring that kids deserve.  In my view, it’s not all that surprising that our reforms haven’t been more effective than they had been today.

 

Daniel Koretz's Plan to Fix...

Newsletter: Share: