What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
With rendition switcher


Daniel Koretz:

Well, I wrote the book for two reasons.  One is that testing has become enormously important not just in education but in public debate in general.  I have, every time, for instance, there are international comparisons, newspapers put it on front page.  But also because there is a tremendous amount of misunderstanding of testing and there really wasn’t a straightforward way for people to learn about it.  So I had for years, students coming back [and they’re] usually annoyed, sometimes furious about things they heard out in the real world about testing.  And they kept saying, “You have to write a book.  You have to write a book.”  The people need to know about testing, policy makers, educators, concerned citizens are not going to slug through 300-page text full of equations.  They’re not, just not going to do it.  So somebody has to write an accessible but thorough book.  So I, finally, after several of them got furious at a speech given by Rod Paige, I said, “All right, I’ll do it.”  And so what I did is I wrote, really, three separate things and combine them into a book.  One part is just a non-technical explanation of the key concepts that you need to understand to argue sensibly about testing.  You need to know what bias really is.  You need to know what adverse impact is.  You need to know what reliability is.  So there’s a chunk of the book that simply explains that in concrete terms.  There’s a small part of the book that asks what test scores, at least the ones we can trust, really tell us about American kids because there is a widespread misinterpretation of things like the national assessment or international comparisons.  In the back end of the book, which is what, and surprisingly, has gotten the most attention, applies the first part, the principles to what I considered to be pressing, controversial issues like high [stakes] testing and testing of kids with disabilities or limited proficiency in English.  Surprisingly, I expected that the book would be trashed by educational conservatives because it does say really unkind things about test based accountability as we currently do it and about No Child Left Behind, but that hasn’t been the case.  I think that maybe a sign… In fact, some educational conservatives have praised the book.  I think what’s happened is that there is a growing uneasiness with what we’ve done over the last eight years or so, 7 years.  While people don’t agree on what we should do differently, there’s, I think, a growing awareness that we’ve got to change something.  But my hope is that the book will just contribute in some small way to a more intelligent debate about testing and the people who want to know how to participate in that argument and those arguments will have a tool that will let them do that. 

More from the Big Idea for Monday, February 06 2012

Testing the Test

The punk band the Minutemen said, "Being born is power." Bertrand Russell said, "Education as a political weapon could not exist if we respected the rights of children." Who's correct? In our i... Read More…


Daniel Koretz on Measuring ...

Newsletter: Share: