What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
With rendition switcher


Question: Should the government be responsible for universal healthcare?

Dan Ariely: Absolutely. So the . . . As you start realizing – and I’m realizing more and more over the years – our inabilities, mine included, you realize more and more that somebody has to take a role. Somebody has to take responsibility. So think about healthcare. Is this really the right system for a free market? If you’re . . . If you’re a free market fanatic, of course you will say yes. But how many people, for example, are going to shop when they have heart attacks? Not many. Seventy percent of the income for any hospital comes from the ER. These are not people who are shopping and comparing prices. Should these forces, when there’s actually a monopoly, be left for people . . . people’s decision? Well the other thing. Preventative healthcare is so crucial. It’s so crucial. I mean we can talk about diabetes, asthma. There is no reason for anybody to go to ER anymore about asthma. The medications are fantastic. But ER visits to the hospital for asthma are in charge of about 97 percent of the cost. I mean if you just take your inhaler on time everything will be fine. But people don’t. They fail repeatedly. Now diabetes is the same thing. Early detection is incredibly crucial because you can control it. If you don’t detect it early you have to cut people’s limbs off. I mean there’s blindness. There’s all kinds of consequences. Now we as a society are paying these consequences many times. Is it . . . Is it the case that you should just leave it for people to do what is the best for them? If you understand that people can’t do it, then you have to think about a different system.

Topic: Irrational Healthcare Policies

Dan Ariely: Yeah.  So . . . So I think that, you know, healthcare is crazy the way we do it.  And just give you some numbers.  Hospitals don’t recover about a third of their bills, okay?  That means that we have the most expensive national healthcare in the world.  Why?  Because people who are sick and don’t have money can’t go to a doctor.  So what they do – they wait until they’re very sick and they go to the ER.  That’s a crazy system.  Now in some sense we’re all paying through it from insurance, but a third of the bills of hospitals are never paid?  That’s an incredible subsidy, and something that could have been done much cheaper under a national healthcare.  So that’s one.  I think savings . . . retirement saving is a big problem, and in many ways.  One . . . One approach in which it’s very difficult is that the government is giving us clues about what’s the right amount of saving.  They tell us if you put $15,000 in your 401K, you’re fine.  If you put $3,000 in your Roth IRA you’re fine.  You are not fine.  If you’re my age – 40 – and you just start saving, you will never make it.  You will never make it.  So in some sense it’s very hard to figure out how much we need to save.  But the government is giving us hints, and these hints are wrong.  That’s . . . That’s another . . . another thing.  And then, you know, there’s all kinds of other small things, but I think those are two of the big ones.

Recorded on: Feb 19 2008



Dan Ariely on the Governmen...

Newsletter: Share: