What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
With rendition switcher


Guy Kawasaki: When you have this kind of perspective that you’ve arrived, that you have established a brand, that’s a really slippery slope towards just egomania.  In a sense, I’ve written 10 books; do I consider myself this world-class author?  No.  Do I consider myself a brand?  Eh, you know, slightly. I mean, not like Coca-Cola or Apple, obviously.  In the tech world, in social media, yes.  But I don’t… I wouldn’t say you’d call me humble, but I don’t like wake up in the morning saying, “God, what a great brand I am.”  I mean, that’s kind of bullshit. 

I would advise people to not think that way, that you know, if you wake up one day, you say, “I’m a brand,” you’re pretty much sliding on that slope towards destruction. 

10 years ago… it’s a long story, but I had a Porsche 911 and I’m driving down the street in **** Park, and I stop at a stop light and I look over to my left and I see this car full of teen-aged girls and they’re looking at me and they’re smiling at me and they’re laughing and they’re giggling and finally one of them motions, you know, roll down the car window.  So I’m sitting there and I’m thinking, you know, I have truly arrived. I’m truly a brand. You know, they probably know me from my background as an evangelist at Apple or maybe they’ve seen me as an author or maybe they’ve seen me as a venture capitalist, but I’ve truly arrived because now teen-age girls are you know, waving me down on the street. 

So I rolled down the window and this girl leans out and says to me, “Are you Jackie Chan?”  And it was just, like one of the world’s funniest moments for me.  So now one of my goals in life, speaking of personal brands, is that some day in Hong Kong, Jackie Chan is driving his car, stops at a light, the car next door is full of teen-age girls and they ask Jackie Chan to roll down his window, he rolls down his window and they ask him, are you Guy Kawasaki?  That’s my goal.



More from the Big Idea for Monday, July 30 2012

Today's Big Idea: Summer School for the Real World

There are two types of "syndroms" that employers are extremely wary of when looking to hire recent college graduates. The first is the "Mark Zuckerberg syndrom," the expectation some young peop... Read More…


Check Your Ego

Newsletter: Share: