What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
With rendition switcher


Question: Can newspapers survive the digital revolution?

Peter Rojas: Well I think . . . I get asked about newspapers a lot. And I’ve written for newspapers. I’ve written for the New York Times. And I actually do love, you know, newspapers. I love newspapers and magazines. I subscribe to like maybe 20 different magazines, which I devour. I love . . . You know one of my favorite things to do is I try to, you know, read the New Yorker, or the Economist, or you know Harpers or whatever for about an hour before I go to bed every night. Which I . . . I really like to be able to get away from looking at an LCD screen all day. But you know they’re going to have to change. And the thing is they are changing. And the question is are they gonna change quickly enough? And I don’t have . . . I don’t know. I mean I think that, you know, the answer isn’t just launching a bunch of blogs. It’s a lot more complicated than that. And I think that . . . that newspapers are gonna have to get used to a world where things are a little bit leaner. And you know the cost of producing content in a lot of respects have fallen. I mean you know the cost of publishing has really fallen. That’s what enabled, you know, me to do blogs was that I didn’t need . . When I was at Red Herring, we spent a million dollars to build an online publishing system for RedHerring.com. And I was able to create something with roughly equivalent functionality for like $150 bucks. And so to see that . . . that sort of huge of a . . . of a drop in the cost of doing something . . . and that’s sort of been the story of . . . I mean you know when people talk about Web 2.0, I mean to me the real story is that the cost of doing all these things, whether it was like publishing, you know, video online or, you know, publishing text, or all these, you know, things, the cost of doing all that stuff has really dropped. And you know for newspapers, their . . . their real cost is . . . has not just been in the publishing platforms or the cost of like printing paper. It’s really in the human talent that is out there. And one of the things that blogs and other socially driven, like you know, news and information sites . . . whether it’s like Digg, or Propel It, or ReadIt, or Engadget or whatever are all good at doing is sort of aggregating a lot of stuff from across the Internet and presenting it in some sort of useful fashion; whether it’s by having editors pick stuff or having, you know, readers vote on what they find interesting. And I think for newspapers it’s tough because they’re . . . they’re in the, you know . . . They have a . . . For them it’s not about aggregating exactly. It’s about, you know, creating, and then editing, and then editing again, and then publishing. And I think they’re . . . they’re gonna have to live in a world that’s a little bit . . . That has sort of a sliding . . . like a kind of a continuum from, you know . . . that includes what they’re doing, but also is aggregating and making sense of the other stuff that’s out there. And I don’t necessarily have a lot of good advice. I mean I know . . . Maybe you guys have interviewed Jeff Jarvis, who is sort of a leading light in this area.


Recorded on: 10/2/07


Can newspapers survive the ...

Newsletter: Share: