What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close

Quick Observations on the New Hampshire Primary

January 10, 2012, 10:35 PM
Thumbnailcao1alx3

1. The turnout was lower than in 2008 and almost half of the voters in the Republican primary were independents.  That shows, of course, an unexpected lack of enthusiasm among Republicans.  They have to hope the enthusiasm is still there for defeating the president, and the problem is the uninspiring cast of candidates.

2. Romney won decisively but nobody thinks he did really well. 

3. But most of the rest of the vote went to Paul and Huntsmanwho aren't serious challengers for the nomination.  That's great news for Romney.  So he made great progress toward being nominated without really doing very well.

4. Paul did well and a bit better than expected because the turnout was low and almost half the voters were independents.  He didn't do well among actual Republicans, and there won't be another state soon where his situation is so favorable.  Don't forget he still lost!

5. Huntsman can't do a darn thing with his little better than unimpressive showing, except maybe wait for 2016.

6. Gingrich and Santorum, Romney's most formidable challengers, did a bit worse than expected (and not much was expected) but not badly enough to drop out.  Neither picked up any momentum, and Santorum lost some.  It's not clear at all which of them is now the most credible alternative to Romney.

7. So both Santorum and Gingrich go on to South Carolina wounded but not quite in critical condition.  They'll probably split the anti-Romney majority of the vote in SC down the middle.

8. That means Romney, once again, might well not do very well but still come in first and make more huge progress toward the nomination.

9.  Santorum made the point that Romney is like Dole and McCain.  In the cases of Dole and McCain, an old guy got nominated because he had lost before and now it seemed to be his turn. Santorum's advice:  Don't nominate another loser for that lame reason.

10. Some (like me) have been saying that 2012 would be different.  Flip-floppy Romney won't get the nomination because of the ideological enthusiasm of the Tea Party voters.

11. But it turns out the Tea Party has lacked a credible candidate, and so 2012 is likely not going be so different after all.

 

Quick Observations on the N...

Newsletter: Share: