What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more

Mitt and His Lit Major

May 1, 2012, 10:46 AM

Students at a small, liberal-arts college complained to Mitt Romney about borrowing money to pursue a college major that doesn't lead to a job.  He replied, sensibly, that some majors have a lot more job opportunities connected with them than others.  He might have mentioned, it seems to me, stuff like accounting, nursing, and computer science.

Romney himself majored in English literature.  His experience, he explained to students, is that with his major all you can do is go to graduate school.  So Mitt himself went on to get degrees in law and business.  He managed to go on to make a good living for himself and his family.

Shouldn’t Romney have talked up the obvious ways his major has been a great benefit to him in his life's work?  He’s the most able and most correct talker among Republican presidential candidates for a long time.  He’s got grammar, syntax, and the correct and even subtle use of words down.  We can wish he’d be more poetic, but that’s not his style. The truth is that he’s better off the cuff than even our eloquent professor-president.

Compare Mitt with Rick Perry the Aggie ag major.  Don’t major in agriculture, someone might say, if you’re planning to run for president, although there are, I think, still plenty of jobs for ag majors.  Or Hermann Cain, the math major, whose undeniable enthusiasm that often comes somewhere near eloquence is at the expense of correctness and ordinary clarity.  Or even business major Rick Santorum, whose grammar gets all confused when he gets excited.  I could add comments here about the Presidents Bush and even President Reagan.  (Actually, Reagan was better than people remember, but it turns out that he read a lot more good books for pleasure than people thought.)

So should the lesson of Romney be that the perfect combination is an undergraduate major in liberal arts and a specialized graduate degree (or two)?  Specialization too early is at the expense of eloquence and precision in language, among other qualities that every leader should have.

No specialization at all and you might end up like the young women displayed on the new HBO series Girls.  I don’t really enjoy that show, but it is done well.  Those “girls” are whiny and inspire a combination of pity and contempt.  Their literary studies and liberal-arts college experiences left them pretty clueless when it comes not only to earning a living, but in their relationships, moral judgments, and their misguided and degrading sexual “adventures.”  If you want an indictment of what goes on at our allegedly sophisticated colleges, watch this show.

But at my Berry College, students really are able—through the work program and many other ways—to pick up lots of skills and self-confidence outside of the classroom without getting college credit for every “experience” and “engagement.”  Our admissions people should show parents an episode of Girls and explain why our grads hardly ever turn out like THAT, even or especially if they choose a liberal-arts major.

They're more likely to follow a road not all that dissimilar from Mitt’s, and there’s nothing at all wrong with that.


Mitt and His Lit Major

Newsletter: Share: