What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more

Why More Republicans Aren't Voting

February 4, 2012, 2:32 PM

In Florida four years ago about 1.95 million people voted in the Republican primary. This year 1.66 million people voted in the same primary. That’s 300,000 fewer people, a 14% drop in a state that has only been growing. Of course, part of the reason for the drop could be that four years ago the Florida Save Our Homes Amendment was on the ballot, which may have motivated more people to get out to the polls.

Nevertheless, as Nate Silver says, this isn’t a great sign for Republicans. Although absolute turnout was up in the first three states to vote, Florida is such a large state that this means that turnout is down for the nominating process as a whole. As Silver argues, this picture looks even worse for Republicans when you consider that independent voters didn’t have the alternative of voting in competitive Democratic primary this year. If you look at turnout among just among voters who self-identify as Republicans—as opposed to who register Republican just for a primary—turnout has been down substantially in every state but South Carolina. Overall turnout among Republican self-identifiers is down 10% from 2008, a year when Republican candidate lost the presidency.

Republicans certainly may be able to rally base to vote against Barack Obama in the general election. But it does look like the enthusiasm Republican voters showed in the 2010 has already waned. That probably at least in part reflects Republican voters’ dissatisfaction with what their party has been able to accomplish with control of the House. It probably also reflects increasing dissatisfaction with the Republicans who are running for the nomination. A recent Pew poll found that more than half of Republicans and voters who lean Republican rate the current Republican field is “only fair” or “poor.” In comparison, more than two-thirds rated the Republican field as “excellent” or “good” four years ago when John McCain was the front-runner.

It’s tempting to imagine that things would be different if only someone like Mitch Daniels or Chris Christie had entered the race. But that’s because their weaknesses still haven’t been exposed by the nominating process—remember, it wasn’t that long ago that people were calling for Rick Perry to enter the race. In all likelihood the reason fantasy candidates like Daniels and Christie didn’t enter the race because their exploratory committees told them they didn’t have the support or the organization to win the nomination. In other words, they lost the what political scientists call "the invisible primary" that weeds out potential candidates who don't have a good chance of winning from ever actually running.

The truth is that the uninspiring Republican field is not some piece of random bad luck, but a product of the party’s larger strategy of playing to conservative outrage by focusing on attacking Obama almost to the exclusion of everything else. While that strategy may have succeeded in hurting Obama, it has also left the Republican Party without a coherent message or compelling candidates of its own.

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore


Why More Republicans Aren't...

Newsletter: Share: