What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos

1

Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers

2

Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge

3

Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more
Close

Principles of the Open Future

December 18, 2013, 6:34 PM
Shutterstock_68628676

When public evidence and rational deduction is sufficient to answer a question we must all be swayed by that rationale and must be swayed by the answer.  When public evidence is not sufficient to answer a question, we must promote and encourage the widest range of disagreement and competition among people with different views.  I think those principles underlie healthy democratic societies as well as science.  

When it comes to questions about religion and spirituality I prefer not to disagree, not to contest them publicly.  

So evolution, climate change, many issues of medical science – I think as long as people of faith respect the rational deduction of science in those areas where no reasonable person can disagree, then we scientists have to say we are happy to live in a society with you whatever your religious faith is.

Your religious faith concerns issues that the evidence does not suffice to decide.  So I like the writings of my friend Richard Dawkins and Dan Dennett.  I understand what they’re about.  I understand what they’re getting at but I think that it’s not my job and it’s not my fight.  It’s not my job as a scientist to get into that old fight between people of faith and people of science because my understanding of a democratic society is that as long as they respect the facts and the deductions of science we should be respectful of their faith and their search for a faith and their search for answers in these very, very difficult questions that science so far at least does not provide answers to. 

In Their Own Words is recorded in Big Think's studio.

Image courtesy of Shutterstock

 

 

Principles of the Open Future

Newsletter: Share: