Cutting-edge physics in all its remarkable strangeness

The Birth of Our Universe (It's Violent & Continually Changing)

Bb

Up until just a few hundred years ago most people thought that the Universe was a stable, static place that had been here forever and would continue forever. Today we know that nothing could be further from the truth. In reality, we know that the Universe is a violent and continually changing place that was born in a mere nanosecond of time in the spectacular event we call the Big Bang. You may have heard the Big Bang referred to as the mother of all explosions but it wasn’t an explosion so much as an expansion. From a space that was infinitely small, the entire Universe expanded and continues even to this day -13.7 billion years later.

Lots of people wonder how we even arrived at that number and how we originally calculated the age of the Universe in the first place. It started with some educated guesswork and later got refined through some sophisticated technologies. A remarkable astronomer, Edwin Hubble was really one of the very first to make a reliable calculation of the age of the Universe. When Hubble was at Mount Wilson in the 1920’s, astronomers still believed that the Universe was static and not moving. But when Hubble looked at the very distant galaxies through a large new telescope, he began to notice that light was a bit distorted. The yellow galaxies appeared to be slightly redish and he wondered if the color change might be due to something called the Doppler effect. According to Wikipedia, the Doppler effect is commonly heard when a vehicle sound a siren or horn approaches, passes and then recedes from an observer. The same Doppler effect happens with starlight which becomes distorted and changes color. Hubble was then able to estimate the distance to certain stars and soon realized that they were receding and moving away from us. This meant that the Universe wasn’t static at all and was in fact actually expanding and had been for billions of years. Hubble’s work was a monumental discovery and changed everyone’s view on the way they looked at the Universe. 

As hard as this is to fathom, at the very beginning, just at the instant of the Big Bang, the entire universe was infinitely smaller than an atom and we call this infinitely tiny point a singularity. This also raises the question of what was going on before the Big Bang. The problem we have is that standard mathematics just don’t apply before the Big Bang. There are of course beautiful animations of what we think may have happened during this bang but the fact is that the explosion took place in a time that is so short that it simply cannot be comprehended. The Universe expanded not into space but as space. In other words, matter did not simply explode but space expanded. It grew from a dot infinitely smaller than an atom to an area billions of light years across in a mere fraction of a second.

The Big Bang expanded as it cooled and as it cooled different kinds of matter began to condense out. For example, atoms began to condense about 300,000 years after the Big Bang. We still have lots of questions and there is still lots to learn but machines like the Large Hadron Collider are bringing us closer than ever before. With every successful experiment - we are closer to understanding the birth of our UNIVERSE.  

Discuss

Duane Abbajay
Does the following statement (from the article) - "It grew from a dot infinitely smaller than an atom to an area billions of light years across in a mere fraction of a second." Suggest that this event (the expansion from singularity) was beyond our laws of physics (faster than the speed of light) and therefore the universe somehow "settled in" to our laws of physics?
Susan vandenHam
Susan vandenHam
I'm glad some of the best scientific minds we (i.e., the earth) have are working to uncover this great mystery. I love to wonder about things, but I really love to know about them, in as much as anyone can "know" anything. Though I'm 62, I have hopes that the mystery of our birth will be figured out in my lifetime. Now that's something worth sticking around for! :)
Greg Michael Hazen
I love how this just puts everything I ponder about into well written words.
Patrick Lupez
I'm no expert so please pardon me if i'm showing ignorance. What i can't really comprehend about this theory is that the massively unimaginable vastness of the observable universe we now know came from infinitely small in fact you said smaller than an atom, the singularity. How did this tiny smaller than atom thing expanded so massively that billions of galaxies managed to fit inside it with extra more spaces in between them?? I can imagine this theory if applied to myself i.e. removing all the spaces to all of the atoms in my body, but not to the massive universe. You said there are still lots of question, is this one of them?
nike su
As hard as this is to fathom, at the very beginning, just at the instant of the Big Bang, the entire universe was infinitely smaller than an atom and we call this infinitely tiny point a singularity. This also raises the question of what was going on before the Big Bang. amazing ! incredible ? how a whole universe can seemingly originate from what is smaller than a mere dot.
Brett Etheridge
I wonder what the future will tell us when we are able to observe smaller and smaller, point particles specifically. I think that certain particles like electrons fall under the uncertainty principle because we simply cannot calculate or even observe fast enough to see their movement or behavior before they are destroyed or transferred. I reckon that will play into the next evolution in observational technology.
Shalom Freedman
Why is there anything at all? How do we explain the 'singularity' or very first state of the Universe? Is there a point where human answers cannot be the answer?
Gerhold Kooper
Well, the age of the universe I cannot understand in comparison with the time humans and animals were around. What happened for human and animals and plant live to just appear some billion years after the formation of earth and the universe? Why is it that our knowledge grew so rapidly in two centuries that human for "millions of years" could not figure out? Coming back to the age, the articles states and we can agree that our laws and known facts of physics, mathematics and other disciplines of science do not apply to the birth of the universe and yet we use our laws of science to calculate its age? How do you expect to do that? How did the universe expand from singularity to infinity and all the different matter to appear?
Darrell Kitchen
Darrell Kitchen
First things first. This opening sentence: "Up until just a few hundred years ago most people thought that the Universe was a stable, static place that had been here forever and would continue forever" is only true when refering to the word "most". Those individuals who sat under the teachings of a man from northern India, name of Sidharta Gautama, commonly knows as the Buddha, knew the universe was flux and continuously changing. In his recollection of the process which brought about his enlightenment, Buddha was recorded in writing as saying he recollected many (manifold) expansions and collapses of the universe. This statement alone means most people were aware of the universe as having a beginning and ending, many times over. And they were aware of the universe as non-static.
Dave Van der Voort
Dave Van der Voort
Do scientists expect that there are more singularities, some partially expanded as ours, and some yet to expand? Does each singularity create a universe? If so, what would you call the "space" in which all singularities reside?
Dave Van der Voort
Dave Van der Voort
Do scientists expect more singularities exist, some partially expanded as ours, and others yet to expand? Does each singularity expansion create a universe? If so, what is the "space" holding the singularities called?
Susan vandenHam
Susan vandenHam
A lot of people are wondering how something so small as a (the) singularity could produce such vastness as our universe holds. Let your mind wander and think about a seed. Sometimes we find little seedlings from trees in our yard. Just a tender little thing but whose potential is enormous. A little seedling that becomes a mighty oak, that drops other seeds, that can produce other oaks, that... . Forests upon forest from one tiny little seed. Amazing. ... I say this only as a comparison of how something so little has such huge potential. We do not know why (yet) such a little thing as the singularity could produce such vastness, but look to the seedling as a possible clue to the truth of this mystery. And keep letting your mind wander :)
Brett Etheridge
What specifically is the science behind why the Universe is believed to be expanding? If it's just the Doppler Shift distorting light, then I can think of 3 other reasons for that occurring.
Patrick Lupez
Susan Vandenham, that is a very interesting idea. As interesting as it is, i'm afraid it begs for more questions. A seed doesn't grow big by itself, it needs help and so if a singularity needs help then the universe didn't start from the singularity. Multiverse could perhaps answer it but then again there should be a very first universe that started from a singularity or seed that doesn't need help to inflate... hmm mind boggling. I can only that answer will come soon. Brett, interesting, care to share your explanation for the expansion/inflation other than what Mr. Hubble theorised?
Cameron McGraw
Duane Abbajay, to answer your question, the expanding space does not go beyond our laws of physics. Einstein's theory of special relativity states that no matter can exceed the speed of light, but in this instance, the empty space is not comprised of matter and is able to expand many times faster than the speed of light. However, in a way, the universe did "settle in" to our laws of physics, in that at the beginning of the universe the four forces we see today that comprise our laws of physics (gravity, electromagnetism, strong and weak nuclear forces) were unified in a singular superforce. After big bang we see that this unified, symmetric force was broken and eventually separated into the four forces that now regulate the physical interactions of our universe today.
Susan vandenHam
Susan vandenHam
Hello Patrick! I apologize for not commenting sooner but I have been on vacation this last week. I like that you are thinking about the seed comparison. The idea that I was trying to demonstrate was the “power aspect” behind the little seedling; how something so small could have such huge potential, almost beyond imagination. ... You pointed out that if our universe started from a singularity, it must have needed some kind of help, as did the seedling. It kind of reminds me of the old "which came first, the chicken or the egg" dilemma. And how did that first thing, whether the chicken or the egg, get here to start with? Now there's the $64k question! ... Maybe the LHC will help us discover how the mineral world works (on the smallest possible scale), just as we now know how the little (organic) seedling works. Still, we don't know where that first seed (or singularity) came from ;). And I don’t think even the LHC can tell us that.
Clem Robins
okay, i'm confused here. the universe expands from a dot "infinitely smaller than an atom to an area billions of light years across in a mere fraction of a second"? i thought the speed of slight was the ultimate velocity. are they saying that the expansion of the universe during the inflationary era took place at velocities faster than that of light?
Kenneth Henrik Olsen
"The universe infinitly smaller than an Atom". How do you expect me to imagine this ? When it is unimaginable ? Let me tell you one thing. If you take all frequencies of all energies in the universe. Do you think you can condense this into a size under one atom? Energy is pulses with oscillations of + and - around a 0-line. It is a magnetizing living force. And can not be compressed into an unimaginable little tiny winy, just because table mathematic grants that to you. When you unwrap the atom, they are all descrete energies that eventually are waveforms (Hadrons UUD). Actually mass is a deception, it is reflection of light in resonant orbital condensations. That means : there is only energy, in different forms. If you pack enough waveforms together, you get particles. (...) The Big Bang relies on a linear thought, and takes for granted that particles are initial structure of space. That is wrong, it is the waveforms that are the building components of solid matter. The particle is a condensed form of wave energy. This is seen inversly in the LHC, where the particles leave off energy trails before vanishing into ALICE medium, earth or vaccum. The Plasma Creation model, is suggesting a continous creation. Atoms generated in resonant oscillation from the vacuum sheet, and atoms are recycled in Black Hole oscillation. From wave it came and to wave form it goes. A believer of Big Bang would say, all babies (protons) are born at once (Big Bang). There is no generation. If Big Bang is true, Me and my grandfather are equally old !
Maham Fatima
if the universe started out as a tiny little nugget, was there anything surrounding this nugget? was there anything inside of this? do we know the ingredients of the universe at the time of its beginning?
Rodrigo Amorio Valsdez
I for myself, didn't discount the theory of our brilliant Physicist. On the other hand, everybody could posed their own theory on how the Universe was formed. Nevertheless, as of this time, we are still facing on blank wall since, our astronomers are only using telescope to observe the movement of stars and the universe because we are, still on the zero civilization according to Dr. Kaku. Someday, human could invent a vehicle that could travel beyond our solar system and personally discover on what was really happening out there then, maybe that will be time that our question on how the universe was formed would be answer. 3000 years from now there is still religion to believe but , Science in preparation for exodus to another star for our descendant to live on. And it cannot be denied, our astronomers has able to spot a planet that is habitable by human using only a telescope. A big vow, to our physicist who exerted their effort in the field of Science....
sean none james
design for me i try to think of it this way, as the Universe (matter) inside an bottle, then ask yourself where did the bottle (space) come from ? but there is a paradox, do you see it ?
Paul Evers
where did the dot come from?
sean none james
If its found that the Universe has no end how can the big bang be true ?
Chuck Aston
Chuck Aston
I recall hearing on a Sci Channel docu that, in the current model, in order to account for the universe's current size, the universe must have expanded faster the speed of light during the Inflation phase, which began shortly (very shortly) after the Big Bang. For now, the obvious problem with this are shelved in deference to the observations.
Krista Anderson
Krista Anderson
There is no contradiction with the laws of physics because Einstein's theory states that nothing within spacetime can move faster than the speed of light. When discussing the expansion of the universe it is spacetime itself that is expanding. In reference to what Chuck was saying inflationary theory is used to explain why there are things in the universe that are now and may forever be beyond our horizon (they are too far away and moving away too fast for their light to ever reach us). From what I have read most experiments reveal that spacetime continues to expand faster than the speed of light, so everday there is more out there that will forever be out of reach on earth.
Ryan Halaska
I don't know if this is an already explored theory or not, but I think about the "Big Bang" a lot differently then the information I've heard. I truly believe that the big bang happened, and didn't; is happening, and isn't; and will happen, and won't in an infinite cycle, and thus, we have "time" from the constant expansion AND collapse of THIS universe giving the illusion of stability, in that our consciousnesses flow intrinsically unaware of this cycle. The "point" of space from which it expands and collapses is found in every particle and wave we perceive as creating our "reality". Assuming it "expands" from every "separate" particle, and every "separate" time in an equal fashion, there can be no "boundaries" because if you ever got to the "edge" then whatever particles comprise that point in space and time would be also constantly expanding and collapsing at the same rate as the point in space and time you started your journey from, therefore making space infinite and time infinite. All space is made of the same "particle" simply resonating at an infinite multitude of waveforms making the composition of every "point" infinitely variable. So you can essentially point one finger in the air, and say "This is where a Big Bang was, is, and will be." Past, Present, Future. All times are happening at the same time, it is our conscious free will that will determine where we will be when we want to be.
Ryan Halaska
Essentially I propose we look into the union of Consciousness, Time, and Space. The only time that exists for consciousness is "now", even though we know time is always seemingly "flowing". The only space for consciousness is "here", even though we know space is always seemingly "flowing". We can go "There, Later" but once we do we are "Now, Here" and when we leave we "Were, There".
Kevin McCord
Kevin McCord
If the universe is expanding, would it not be possible to take measurements of the stars distances from earth to establish a location for the "Initial Expansion" As I believe it should be, measuring the distances over a period of time should show a direction of travel.
eddy jacobsen
eddy jacobsen
When will this stupid Big Bang phrase stop to be presented; what is it? If a car crashes in a tunnel, do we call it the Bang in the tunnel or the Car crashed in the tunnel? Well, so The Creation of Universe is logical to call it. Where ever universe came from; its material, tells about an intelligence we cannot even imagine We - human beings - are chicken heads in comparison. If scientists can tell me where universe came from; I shall be very glad. But certain it is, if somebody wants to end up in a lunacy asylum; just continue to think about it. Therefore I have stopped those thought, avoiding getting being a nut case. All the best folks www.youtube.com/onlinelondon

Add a Comment

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register