Cutting-edge physics in all its remarkable strangeness

A Voyage Through the Multiverse and Higher Dimensional Hyperspace

Multi

"Remarkable claims require remarkable proof." -- Carl Sagan

The "multiverse" idea—once thought to be so crazy it only belonged on late night television—has now become the dominant theory in all of cosmology. The idea now dominates conversations in science circles and it seems you cannot avoid the theory of the multiverse.

Einstein first gave us the idea that the universe is a soap bubble of some sort and we reside on the skin of this expanding bubble. This observation of an expanding bubble is now one of the greatest experimental achievements of the last century. Now imagine if you run the videotape backwards, the bubble would shrink and eventually become small enough to put in your coat pocket. If this "bang" happened once, it can happen again, again and again. This concept is mind boggling, that idea that entire universes are being created as you are reading this very blog entry. 

When speaking about the multiverse, I’m often asked questions about the different kinds of universes that can form as a result of extra dimensions, string theory or even chaotic inflation for example. These are in some sense different kinds of universes but for me personally, it’s very aesthetically pleasing. This all goes back to my childhood with my parents being Buddhist. In Buddhism, you believe in nirvana and timelessness with no beginning and no end. As a child I went to Sunday school where I learned about arks, great floods and the instant of creation when God said, “Let there be Light”. So, all my life I’ve had these two competing paradigms in my head. With the multiverse idea, we have the beautiful melding of these two ideas. The reason being is that we do have this nirvana, this timelessness, this eleven dimensional hyperspace, this arena of string theory. But we also have bubbles that form all the time, almost like a bubble bath. Sometimes the bubbles expand rapidly giving us universes, combine with other bubbles and sometimes even pop. This continual creation, the idea of a multiverse is very pleasing to me because I can now meld Buddhist nirvana with Judeo-Christian epistemology.

We have this arena of eleven-dimensional hyperspace and within it these bubbles start to expand and they vibrate. In string theory we of course have the music of strings which gives us the particles we see in nature. This is also pleasing to me because Einstein spent the last three decades of his life trying to read the mind of God and he asked himself “What are God's thoughts?” Well, believe it or not, for the first time we now have a candidate for the mind of God. The mind of God, according to this multiverse picture, is cosmic music resonating through eleven dimensional hyperspace. When I say "God," I’m talking about the God of Spinoza, not necessarily the personal God that answers prayers and feeds the sick. I’m speaking metaphorically about the God of both harmony and beauty. In other words, as I have stated time and time again, it didn’t have to be this way: our Universe could have been random, chaotic and ugly. And I find it absolutely staggering that we can summarize all the laws of physics going back 2,000 years to the Greeks on a single sheet of paper. The goal of string theory is to, of course, have it in an equation no more than an inch long. In the beginning, there was not light but rather there was the one-inch equation which then drives the gears of the entire Universe. This is the Holy Grail.

We now think that each of these universes have their own constant and their own parameters. These questions for example are for each universe: How long does the proton live? How strong is gravity? How long does the sun burn? So the question is, where is our Universe in this soap bubble of Universes? Our Universe, for instance, has stars that burn for billions of years whereas most of these universes have stars that only burn for a fraction of a second and life never gets started. We are however just now starting to get a glimpse of where we fit into this larger puzzle.

In closing, please find a snippet from Chapter 9 of my book Parallel Worlds

Parallel Universes, dimensional portals, and higher dimensions, as spectacular as they are, require airtight proof of their existence. As the astronomer Ken Croswell remarks, "Other universes can get intoxicating: you can say anything you want about them and never be proven wrong, as long as astronomers never see them." Previously, it seemed hopeless to test many of these predictions, given the primitiveness of our experimental equipment. However, recent advances in computers, lasers, and satellite technology have put many of these theories tantalizingly close to experimental verification.

 

Discuss

Tera
That is mind-boggling. But what if life itself is just... a thought? an imagined phenomenon? the computer could by in my imagination; a book, a person. The universe could itself have some central intelligence and just.. 'THOUGHT' life, without actually creating it. How would scientists prove the higher dimensional hyperspace? just by observation or some other complicated experimentation?
Brett Etheridge
Dr. Kaku, I ask you again, which branch of physics should I join study? ha, I'm just messing with you. If we are on the surface of the bubble, what is on the inside and what is on the outside? I guess that's too much too soon. I think rate of interaction is the primary difference among multiple universes. the rate of interaction of the forces may speed up giving the appearance that they are stronger or slow down giving the appearance they are slower in relationship to our perceptual physical constants. If that one inch equation was a differential one, would you be happy or sad? either way, It's good that you've found happiness in your life's work...what more can anyone really ask for? it truly is a priceless unobtainable obtainable.
Brett Etheridge
maybe that's why all those dark galaxies emitting x-rays don't emit visible light. because if they emit X-rays, then they are obviously emitting photons, so light has had time to reach us from them. Am I the only one seeing the flawed logic in saying that we can detect their X-rays but light hasn't had time to reach us yet...X-rays travel at the speed of light. or else the velocity constant is wrong.
cameron michael keys
Nirvana is when you stop generating negative karmas. If our universe is the best of all possible universes, then this would be a nirvana-like condition. but i don't think Dr. Kaku wants to argue that our universe is the best of all possible universes. So I merely point to this inconsistency in his formulation. I love his books, though! I study Buddhism and Judeo-Christianity, and specifically I'm interested in extraordinary claims associated with supernormal or supernatural behaviors: for example, levitation. Dr. Kaku points out that a magnetic field 30,000 times stronger than that of the earth would levitate a small animal. Thus, levitating monks would have to generate a very strong energy current in order to levitate. If you study the relevant literature, you may believe this is actually possible with muscle contractions, visualizations, breathing techniques, and various oscillating crystals and powerful gong resonators.
Suzy Koscso
I love the thought of multiverses. But my favourite type of multiverse is the "type 3" multiverse (I have heard in a documentary that's what it's called), so the theory based on quantum mechanics, which says every time we make a decision or something happens the universe splits into several other universes and everything that could possibly happen actually happens in one of these universes. To me this is what really mind-boggling and it really moves my fantasy! Because that means in one world I may be a scientist, in another a rock star, in another a homeless. I am happy with my universe, but it's really cool to think I can be anything, and maybe I am! Not to mention the several alternative world histories.
Reptillian
Reptillian
In the next 200 years the big bang theory will undoubtedly be subject to modification. A general relativistic quantum theory would likely have some very interesting things to say about the early universe. Even within the currently existing theory there is plenty of wiggle room when dealing with the early universe and its large scale structure. In particular, I think the assumption of spatial isotropy somewhat questionable. Its interesting that when you have a overall local preferred direction on the surface of the earth, up, you get a unique point in space…the earth’s center on a global scale. The big bang theory makes the assumption that there is an overall local preferred direction in time throughout the surface of space, so I don’t think its surprising that we get a unique center in time corresponding to the origin of the universe. Also, if a theory unifying the four forces ever comes along, it will probably alter our understanding of the universe’s evolution. At any rate, I think it’s a bit premature to be saying things like “If it happened once it can happen again.” Its not like the big bang was an event occurring within some larger spacetime. At this point what we have is a lot of speculation…that’s why I’m not a huge fan of imagining that there are multiple universes…I’ve got enough trouble describing just the one. There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact. -Mark Twain
Robert Baldwin
Robert Baldwin
One word, consciousness. Try to explain it with any theory. If any scientist or physicist can explain this, then i will conceder their theory. BIOCENTRISM is a book that can help to understand what is really going on. By the way the book is by Robert Lanza, MD Also you can YouTube Stuart Hameroff Pt. 1-7 He has a great view of Quantum conciousness.
Ali Alkadhim
What a great physics era we are living in. But say we reach a theory of everything, and we have tested and proven it, where will future physics go? I mean if we reach an elegant theory that summarizes all the physical laws of the universe, isn't that the ultimate goal of physics?
Erich R. Thompson
How excited I am to see science bringing together religion! It has been a deeply felt, intuitive feeling of mine since I was yay tall (hold out hand about 2.5 feet high from the carpet) that each religion of the world is simply trying to interpret the universe and the idea of a supreme being that has developed so much order and balance so that everything works out peachy. I have had many friends from all walks of life in the massive, low income apartments I grew up in and later my culturally, racially diverse high school. Each of them have had different religions views, or more common place this day and age lack there of, about religion and creation. Now before you go thinking that I am going to contaminate a theoretical physics discussion by my champion, Dr. Michio Kaku!, with a religious approach you can just stop right there. "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." That's our good friend Albert Einstein's quote. Religion has needed science for a long time, unfortanutely, ignorant minds within religious organizations have tried hampering such a melding of two powerful tools of universal and cosmological comprehension for our entire existence, yet so far. The Hindi religion has gone into great detail to try and show us a view of the universe and cosmology for a very long time. A day to Brahma, their God, is 4.32 billin years and a hundred years to Brahma is 311.04 trillion years. Those numbers line right up with our universe and quite possibly the 100 year analogy may allow the human mind to try and comprehend infinite time and the fact that our universe is a soap bubble of universes and those came off other bubbles and so on and so on. I find it absolutely fascinating that the astrophysical and cosmological community is realizing these things without religion! Bravo! is my exclamation of joy! Here comes science to show up the empirical truth that religion just can't show some people that can't stop asking questions! :p Alas, to have a scientific mind and want to understand everything! Cracks me up to think that for thousands of years people honestly thought God might be mad at our very human nature to simply ask questions and try and interpret our reality and universe.....
Liselotte Ohrn
Perhaps the Brahadvagita and nirvana are right, that we do live in a caotic univers with timelessness (because "past"-no longer exist, "present"-takes up no time at al, and "future" dose not yet exist) how then can time exist?! In this univers of 11-d with Calabi-yau-manifolds. But could someone tell me from where do all these "souls" come from? We´re getting larger and larger in population on Earth each day, so if this should function there must be more to it. Perhaps a twin-univers that we share energy with. We first have too know if the M-thery got it right or not.

Add a Comment

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register