There have been recent signs that the Republicans could bounce back from their devastating defeat last fall in the upcoming midterm elections. As I wrote a month ago, the early signs are that the Democrats may lose ground in the 2010 elections. Now the Washington Post reports that the Democrats are raising substantially less money than they were able to two years ago, in part because large donors have been turned off by the Democrats attempt to regulate big business.
But while the Democrats are likely to lose seats in the House and Senate in 2010, that doesn’t necessarily mean that the Republican Party is about to return to its old prominence. For all the noise generated by “tea party” protests around the country, polls still show that around twice as many people have a favorable view of Democrats as have a favorable view of Republicans.
For years, the traditionally Republican segment of the population has been shrinking. As Michael Grunwald wrote back in May, the American electorate is steadily becoming “less white, less rural, less Christian—in short, less demographically Republican.” And the most conservative group of voters—the elderly—are gradually dying off.
Instead of altering its platform to attract a broader segment of the changing electorate, the Republican Party has purged most of its more moderate members. In the Senate, for example, with the defections of Lincoln Chafee (I-VT) and Arlen Specter (D-PA), Olympia Snowe (R-ME) and Susan Collins (R-ME) are all that remains of the once sizable group of moderate Republicans. And the current stars of the Republican Party—people like Sarah Palin and Liz Cheney—are not likely to win over many moderate swing voters. The Republicans are gambling that a more unified party with a clearer ideological message will be more compelling. Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) summed up their strategy when he said that he would “rather have 30 Republicans in the Senate who really believe in principles of limited government, free markets, free people, than to have 60 people who don’t have a set of beliefs.”
The result has been a more energized party, but one with less broad national appeal. Today, as Steve Benen points out, most of the country has a starkly unfavorable view of the Republican Party. For years Republicans won elections pursuing “a southern strategy,” but as a consequence the South is now the only region where more people view the party favorably than unfavorably. As Andrew Sullivan says—repeating a reader’s remark—the Republican Party is in danger of turning into our version of Canada’s Parti Quebecois. It is becoming, in other words, essentially a regional party, which can do little more than voice its protest at the national level.
That’s why the major policy debates right now—like the debate over health care reform—are primarily going on within the Democratic Party. All Republicans can do is disrupt the process from the sidelines in hopes of making the Democrats look bad. The Republican Party has become “the Party of No,” opposing everything as a matter of principle. But that’s not a viable long-term strategy. As long as the Republicans don’t try to reach out to political moderates, they are likely to remain vocal, passionate, and marginal.
Discuss
tim hall on October 3, 2009, 7:02 PM
Don’t count out the Republicons just yet. They will have unlimited campaign money for 2010. They will control all media by pure force. The internet adds will be 50 to 1.(they learn quick) They will run massive T.V. fear tactics designed straight at the retired Baby Boomers. By use of repetition, they will prove to the Baby Boomers that the Democratic party is stealing all of their retirement and putting them in the street. If a party can buy enough fear propaganda, they will always win elections in a Christian culture. We have a culture that is based on fear.
On health-care, the Republicons need it to fail in areas that they can refute during the summer of 2010. The Democrats need to pass their full bill without any input from acc ross the isle. The Republicons need to sabatoge any part of it that they can. If any major weekness shows up by August, they can call it a failure.
Remember that they do not need great leaders to win. GWB won twice on pure fear tactics. We are a fearing nation of Christians. Our subconscious mind is dominated by fear. All they need is bucket loads of money from Global Corporate America.
If the Democrats force the banks to loan money (bad credit), the economy will take off and gain half of the lost jobs by mid summer. As it stands now, with no credit, there are no purchases, meaning no jobs. We have to bring back junk credit and wean the middle-class off of it over a two year period after gaining jobs. If this should happen, it would end the corporate party for good. As it stands now, the states will continue to go bankrupt and lose jobs that effect the whole economy. Money does not trickle down out of trees. The purchasers are broke. They have been living off of junk credit sense Regonomics started. Junk credit is wrong. But you cannot fix it overnight by taking it away.
Add a Comment
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register