Would You Want to Know If You’ll Get Alzheimer’s?

Tests for a specific gene can indicate elevated risk of the disease. But would you really want to know that you may get it?

James Watson, the co-discoverer of DNA, was the second person to have his genome sequenced.  He found out lots of details about his genetic susceptibility to various diseases, but one thing he didn't want to know was whether he had a serious risk of getting Alzheimer’s.

“I think it is a very personal decision," said Dr. Juan Troncoso of the Johns Hopkins Alzheimer's Disease Research Center during Big Think's recent Breakthroughs: Alzheimer's panel discussion. "Some people may not want to do it. Others who are very practical for planning reasons may want to do it.”

There isn’t a single gene that causes Alzheimer’s disease, yet the gene Apolipoprotein E (APoE) has been implicated as a risk factor for the disease.  People with APoE E4—a version of the gene with an E4 allele—are three to eight times more likely to develop Alzheimer’s than those with a different ApoE allele (E2 or E3).  The E4 allele is present in about 25 to 30 percent of the population.  Importantly, having ApoE E4 doesn't automatic mean a sentence of Alzheimer's disease, and many people with the disease do not have the allele.  Yet, as genetic testing becomes more common, APoE will be where genetic tests look for the risk of this debilitating disease that currently doesn't have a cure.

Dr. Leonard Guarente of the Glenn Laboratory for the Science of Aging at MIT sees little reason for testing without being able to do something about it.  “I would like to know about risk for any disease that can be treated, but for a disease for which there is really no treatment I would rather not know,” he says.

“There is one more twist to this,” says Dr. Tronocoso, “If for some reason you’re going to have a child and you may want to know whether you have a gene that will increase the risk in them.”

Image courtesy of Flickr user jurvetson

The views expressed here are solely those of the participants, and do not represent the views of Big Think or its sponsors.

Personal Growth

The life choices that had led me to be sitting in a booth underneath a banner that read “Ask a Philosopher" – at the entrance to the New York City subway at 57th and 8th – were perhaps random but inevitable.

Keep reading Show less

For thousands of years, humans slept in two shifts. Should we do it again?

Researchers believe that the practice of sleeping through the whole night didn’t really take hold until just a few hundred years ago.

The Bed by Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec.
Surprising Science

She was wide awake and it was nearly two in the morning. When asked if everything was alright, she said, “Yes.” Asked why she couldn’t get to sleep she said, “I don’t know.” Neuroscientist Russell Foster of Oxford might suggest she was exhibiting “a throwback to the bi-modal sleep pattern." Research suggests we used to sleep in two segments with a period of wakefulness in-between.

Keep reading Show less

'Self is not entirely lost in dementia,' argues new review

The assumption "that without memory, there can be no self" is wrong, say researchers.

Photo credit: Darren Hauck / Getty Images
Mind & Brain

In the past when scholars have reflected on the psychological impact of dementia they have frequently referred to the loss of the "self" in dramatic and devastating terms, using language such as the "unbecoming of the self" or the "disintegration" of the self. In a new review released as a preprint at PsyArXiv, an international team of psychologists led by Muireann Irish at the University of Sydney challenge this bleak picture which they attribute to the common, but mistaken, assumption "that without memory, there can be no self" (as encapsulated by the line from Hume: "Memory alone… 'tis to be considered… as the source of personal identity").

Keep reading Show less