Which genes are responsible for intelligence?

Over the past decade, there have been several studies suggesting potential gene variants that may be linked to IQ. 

Where, oh where, does intelligence come from?


Genes seem a sure bet--or at least a significant player in a pool of important factors.  After all, scientific studies have long suggested that intelligence, as measured by intelligence quotient (IQ) tests, is heritable.  If one of your parents has a high IQ, you are more likely to have a high IQ.  If you are a member of a pair of identical twins, you are more likely to have matching IQ scores than your fraternal counterparts.  Your IQ is also more likely to be on par with your siblings than your cousins.  IQ, like height or eye color, seems to pass through the ancestral bloodlines. Thus, there must be a few genes helping propagate those smarts.

Over the past decade, there have been several studies suggesting potential gene variants that may be linked to IQ.  Specific gene variants of APOE, a gene associated with Alzheimer's disease, seemed likely candidates.  Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a cholinergic receptor (CHRM2) and cathepsin D (CTSD), a gene linked to schizophrenia, also showed some promise.  All in all, about an even dozen different SNPs have popped up over the years as being significantly correlated with IQ scores.  But a new study, led by Chris Chabris and David Laibson, suggests that none of these are linked to intelligence when you have a statistically powerful sample size.  The group used three independent data sets with thousands of participants--and none of the findings were replicated.

So why look for intelligence genes at all? Chabris, a psychological scientist at Union College, believes that they can help identify interesting molecular pathways and neural circuits in the brain.

"I don't view finding genes as an end in itself.  It's not that interesting to have a list of random letter and number acronyms listed next to some trait.  That doesn't add much to our knowledge," he says.  "But once we know something about the gene, then we can connect intelligence at the psychological level to biology in a new and potentially more interesting way."

He argues that by identifying the genes associated with a trait like intelligence, scientists can then ask probing questions:  Which biological systems or pathways are those genes involved in?  Where in the brain are their proteins produced?  What is the evolutionary history of those genes?  It can offer scientists, he maintains, a whole new way of understanding the biology of the mind.

Which is why it was a disappointment--and a bit of a surprise--that none of the previously identified genes could be linked to IQ scores. 

Chabris is quick to point out that the results of his study do not mean that the previous studies were flawed:  rather, intelligence is probably a lot like height and may involve a variety of different genes.

"The way height seems to work--why some people are taller and shorter than others within a normal range--seems to be the additive effect of hundreds or even more individual genes, each of which just add or take away that one millimeter," he says.  "There's probably something similar at work in intelligence and other psychological traits."

So what will it take to further our genetic understanding of intelligence?

Chabris' answer is fairly simple:  larger sample sizes.

"Social science traits are complex.  There is no single gene causation like you see in something like Huntington's disease," he says.  "So there are probably multiple or even hundreds of genes at play.  We need to increase our sample sizes by a large degree of magnitude, 100,000 subjects or even more, so we can find the genes that only have these small effects.  Once we nail those down, then we can look at what I think is the coolest question, which is how can we further understand how the brain works by looking at these genes at the molecular level."

He concedes it's a daunting task.  "It's probably going to be a lot more complicated than we hoped.  If it's a thousand genes, well, that's quite a lot to wrap your mind around.  But the field as a whole is probably capable of figuring it out."

What do you think?  What role do genes play in intelligence?

​There are two kinds of failure – but only one is honorable

Malcolm Gladwell teaches "Get over yourself and get to work" for Big Think Edge.

Big Think Edge
  • Learn to recognize failure and know the big difference between panicking and choking.
  • At Big Think Edge, Malcolm Gladwell teaches how to check your inner critic and get clear on what failure is.
  • Subscribe to Big Think Edge before we launch on March 30 to get 20% off monthly and annual memberships.
Keep reading Show less
Photo by Alina Grubnyak on Unsplash
Mind & Brain

Do human beings have a magnetic sense? Biologists know other animals do. They think it helps creatures including bees, turtles and birds navigate through the world.

Keep reading Show less

Harvard: Men who can do 40 pushups have a 'significantly' lower risk of heart disease

Turns out pushups are more telling than treadmill tests when it comes to cardiovascular health.

Airman 1st Class Justin Baker completes another push-up during the First Sergeants' push-up a-thon June 28, 2011, Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska. Participants were allowed 10 minutes to do as many push-ups as they could during the fundraiser. Airman Baker, a contract specialist assigned to the 354th Contracting Squadron, completed 278 push-ups. (U.S. Air Force photo/Airman 1st Class Janine Thibault)
Surprising Science
  • Men who can perform 40 pushups in one minute are 96 percent less likely to have cardiovascular disease than those who do less than 10.
  • The Harvard study focused on over 1,100 firefighters with a median age of 39.
  • The exact results might not be applicable to men of other age groups or to women, researchers warn.
Keep reading Show less

U.S. reacts to New Zealand's gun ban

On Thursday, New Zealand moved to ban an array of semi-automatic guns and firearms components following a mass shooting that killed 50 people.

(Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
Politics & Current Affairs
  • Gun control supporters are pointing to the ban as an example of swift, decisive action that the U.S. desperately needs.
  • Others note the inherent differences between the two nations, arguing that it is a good thing that it is relatively hard to pass such legislation in such a short timeframe.
  • The ban will surely shape future conversations about gun control in the U.S.
Keep reading Show less