The Promise of iPS

Earlier this week, the Nobel Prize for Medicine was awarded to John B. Gurdon and Shinya Yamanaka for their pioneering work in cell reprogramming. The decision was not without controversy. Since Gurdon's early work was used as the basis for cloning projects (including Dolly the sheep), cell reprogramming, or pluripotent stem cells (iPS) technology, has been viewed with quite a bit of suspicion and fear.


Of course, much of that fear is rooted in a future that is far, far away from now. The science fiction version of cell reprogamming has us cloning ourselves (and maybe our pets), "designing" our babies and generally defying nature.  And while many have talked about potential stem cell therapies, like replacing neurons in the substantia nigras of individuals with Parkinson's disease, we aren't there--and aren't likely to be there for a long, long time.  There's still quite a bit of work to be done--and a lot of ethical considerations to be hashed out--before those kinds of programs are realized

But, for me, the real promise of iPS, at this juncture, is to be able to better model neuropsychiatric disease--and test personalized treatments for those disorders. 

Let me give you an example.  When Shinya Yamanaka first transformed a skin cell into a stem cell back in 2006 by altering 4 genes, he inspired thousands of other researchers to embark on similar projects.  One of his colleagues at the Gladstone Institute, Yadong Huang, took the idea and ran with it--managing to turn a skin cell into a neuron by simply changing one gene, Sox2.  And with just one factor at play, Huang's group can reprogram cells with "zero tumor formation"--an issue that many other reprogramming techniques have.

Huang says that, ideally, one day, we might be able to replace cells obliterated by Alzheimer's disease.  "Scientists like myself are very careful about talking about this. We know the brain is very different from other organs and there are many hurdles that must be overcome before we can begin to talk about using stem cell therapy in the brain," he said.  And he's right.

But that doesn't mean iPS is not valuable now.  Huang and other researchers are using these iPS cells to better understand the molecular mechanics of many neuropsychiatric disorders like Alzheimer's.

"Many of the cell culture studies done in Alzheimer's research do not involve human neurons," he told me.  "It's hard to get human neurons.  Sometimes you can get some after brain surgery.  But it's just a small piece and you are taking that piece from someone with damage to the brain.  This technique allows us to really study human neurons in culture and see if we can replicate many of the studies that are currently conducted in animal models."

Furthermore, these generated, living neural networks may help clinicians understand which treatments are best for individual patients.  More and more, neuroscientists are learning that neuropsychiatric disorders are not single diseases but collections of various rare genetic disorders.  One drug will not fit all.  Huang can imagine a future where a patient donates a few skin cells in order to determine which drug is best for their version of the disease.  "This is something that will help us make sure that we are giving patients safe, effective drugs in the future.”

Even without scientists running to inject stem cells into our brains, Gurdon and Yamanaka's win is an exciting coup for medicine.  And I'm excited to see what the real, as opposed to the imagined, future of iPS will bring to the table.

Photo Credit:  nobeastsofierce/Shutterstock.com

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Sponsored
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

People who engage in fat-shaming tend to score high in this personality trait

A new study explores how certain personality traits affect individuals' attitudes on obesity in others.

Pixabay
Mind & Brain
  • The study compared personality traits and obesity views among more than 3,000 mothers.
  • The results showed that the personality traits neuroticism and extraversion are linked to more negative views and behaviors related to obesity.
  • People who scored high in conscientiousness are more likely to experience "fat phobia.
Keep reading Show less

4 anti-scientific beliefs and their damaging consequences

The rise of anti-scientific thinking and conspiracy is a concerning trend.

Moon Landing Apollo
popular
  • Fifty years later after one of the greatest achievements of mankind, there's a growing number of moon landing deniers. They are part of a larger trend of anti-scientific thinking.
  • Climate change, anti-vaccination and other assorted conspiratorial mindsets are a detriment and show a tangible impediment to fostering real progress or societal change.
  • All of these separate anti-scientific beliefs share a troubling root of intellectual dishonesty and ignorance.
Keep reading Show less

Reigning in brutality - how one man's outrage led to the Red Cross and the Geneva Conventions

The history of the Geneva Conventions tells us how the international community draws the line on brutality.

Napoleon III at the Battle of Solferino. Painting by Adolphe Yvon. 1861.
Politics & Current Affairs
  • Henry Dunant's work led to the Red Cross and conventions on treating prisoners humanely.
  • Four Geneva Conventions defined the rules for prisoners of war, torture, naval and medical personnel and more.
  • Amendments to the agreements reflect the modern world but have not been ratified by all countries.
Keep reading Show less