David Goggins
Former Navy Seal
Career Development
Bryan Cranston
Critical Thinking
Liv Boeree
International Poker Champion
Emotional Intelligence
Amaryllis Fox
Former CIA Clandestine Operative
Chris Hadfield
Retired Canadian Astronaut & Author
from the world's big
Start Learning

Defaulting to Conservatism

The brain is a complex and demanding machine.  Given the amount of resources required to run the average brain, it’s no surprise that it takes a few shortcuts when it can.  After all, it’s the ultimate multi-tasker—and needs to distribute its energy in a smart and efficient fashion.  And now, a recent study published online in the Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin suggests that one of those energy-saving shortcuts may have us defaulting to more conservative ideology when we don’t have the resources to think through a situation.  A finding that got the folks in my circle, conservative and liberal alike, talking.

Scot Eidelman, a psychologist at the University of Arkansas, and colleagues asked study participants about their political opinions in two unique situations:  in a bar and in the laboratory.  Bar patrons, happily downing their favorite adult beverages, were asked to identify themselves as a liberal or conservative, give their opinions about a variety of social issues and then blow into a breathalyzer.  The group found that higher blood alcohol levels were associated with conservative positions—despite the person’s professed political leanings.

In the lab, the group once again asked study participants about social issues—but here they manipulated the amount of time individuals had to answer as well as whether or not they were distracted during their response.  When participants were distracted or push to answer quickly, they tended to endorse more conservative ideas including “authority, tradition and private property.”  The researchers concluded that low-effort thought, made quicker and less complicated by alcohol or laboratory manipulations, defaults to more conservative ideology.

I asked Eidelman if he was surprised by the results.  He told me that he wasn’t—but added a caveat, “I was a bit surprised at how easy it was to demonstrate our effect.  Across different ways of measuring or inducing low-effort thought including alcohol and time pressure, community  samples and college students, blue states and red states, and measures of political attitudes, the results clearly converged in support of our predictions.”

As a more liberal thinker, this floors me.  It’s hard to imagine a situation, even taxed by martinis, that I’d back more conservative ideas.  And I can't help but wonder whether there is a difference between a general social policy and something that affects you and your family personally. 

So what might be the benefit of defaulting to a conservative mindset when the situation doesn’t allow you to put a lot of effort into your responses?

“It’s  likely that playing it safe, sticking with what has worked well enough in the past, recognizing that some are above you in the pecking order, and others below, conferred important advantages in our evolutionary past, and still does today.”

But he does admit that breaking from the status quo can also be a boon.  “Of course, it’s also true that breaking out of [conservative] molds has done plenty to promote desirable ends.  Sometimes our first, quick response may be correct or desirable, sometimes not.”

Eidelman argues that basic, non-ideological ways of thinking may have ideological consequences—that our minds may have a modest ideological tilt to the right, such that political conservatism has a psychological advantage when our brains are occupied with other things.  He says it’s an important thing to be aware of.  With the election almost upon us, I can’t help but agree. 

What do you think?  Does your brain have a conservative default?

Credit:  Jeffrey Collingwood/

Live tomorrow! Unfiltered lessons of a female entrepreneur

Join Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter and best-selling author Charles Duhigg as he interviews Victoria Montgomery Brown, co-founder and CEO of Big Think, live at 1pm EDT tomorrow.

Two MIT students just solved Richard Feynman’s famed physics puzzle

Richard Feynman once asked a silly question. Two MIT students just answered it.

Surprising Science

Here's a fun experiment to try. Go to your pantry and see if you have a box of spaghetti. If you do, take out a noodle. Grab both ends of it and bend it until it breaks in half. How many pieces did it break into? If you got two large pieces and at least one small piece you're not alone.

Keep reading Show less

Improving Olympic performance with asthma drugs?

A study looks at the performance benefits delivered by asthma drugs when they're taken by athletes who don't have asthma.

Image source: sumroeng chinnapan/Shutterstock
Culture & Religion
  • One on hand, the most common health condition among Olympic athletes is asthma. On the other, asthmatic athletes regularly outperform their non-asthmatic counterparts.
  • A new study assesses the performance-enhancement effects of asthma medication for non-asthmatics.
  • The analysis looks at the effects of both allowed and banned asthma medications.

Keep reading Show less

Weird science shows unseemly way beetles escape after being eaten

Certain water beetles can escape from frogs after being consumed.

R. attenuata escaping from a black-spotted pond frog.

Surprising Science
  • A Japanese scientist shows that some beetles can wiggle out of frog's butts after being eaten whole.
  • The research suggests the beetle can get out in as little as 7 minutes.
  • Most of the beetles swallowed in the experiment survived with no complications after being excreted.
Keep reading Show less
Mind & Brain

Why are we fascinated by true crime stories?

Several experts have weighed in on our sometimes morbid curiosity and fascination with true crime.

Scroll down to load more…