Crimes, misdemeanors and incomplete brain development

Nearly 10 years ago, the Supreme Court outlawed the death penalty for crimes committed by minors in Roper v. Simmons.  Justice Anthony Kennedy, representing the majority opinion, wrote:


First, as any parent knows and as the scientific and sociological studies respondent and his amici cite tend to confirm, “[a] lack of maturity and an underdeveloped sense of responsibility are found in youth more often than in adults and are more understandable among the young. These qualities often result in impetuous and ill-considered actions and decisions.”

Many who study the brain, particularly brain development, applauded the decision.  In fact, several neuroscientists and psychologist help Simmons' attorney craft his case.

But how far do we take this idea?  What does this lack of development really mean in terms of legal and criminal responsibility?

Walter Madison, attorney for Ma'lik Richmond, one of the two young football players convicted of rape earlier this month in Steubenville, Ohio, believes that his client's immature brain is grounds for an appeal.  The AtlanticWire reports:

To review: Madison is arguing that a 16-year-old's brain is not fully functional enough to determine whether raping an unconscious girl is a bad decision.

...

And finally, just to be clear: neuroscience says that teenagers have "underdeveloped decision processing centers," which is why teens take risks like stealing or doing drugs. Though, science doesn't say that you can blame the rape of an underage, unconscious girl on this kind of poor decision making.

Hmm.  I'm not sure this is what neuroscientists had in mind when they jumped on the Simmons' bandwagon.  Certainly they weren't arguing that anyone under 18 who commits a crime deserves a pass--rather, they argued that, given brain development, youthful perpetrators shouldn't be sentenced to die for their crimes.  I somehow doubt that Madison will get very far with his appeal--but stranger things have happened.

Still, even if Madison was just mugging on television for ratings, there's no question that neuroscience has the power to change the way we think about crime and punishment in the future.  It may even change the way we consider criminal responsibility--a key component in how a judge or jury determines guilt

What do you think?  As we learn more about the brain, how do we draw the right lines around how it's used in criminal proceedings?

Photo credit:  arfo/Shutterstock.com

----------

Did you know that DIRTY MINDS has be re-titled in paperback as THIS IS YOUR BRAIN ON SEX: THE SCIENCE BEHIND THE SEARCH FOR LOVE?  You can find it at major booksellers everywhere starting 3/26/13.

Related Articles

To save us, half of Earth needs to be given to animals

We're more dependent on them than we realize.

(Photo Lily on Unsplash)
Surprising Science
  • Scientists says our survival depends on biodiversity.
  • A natural climate strategy we often forget.
  • Seeing our place among the Earth's living creatures.
Keep reading Show less

New infographics show how cigarette smokers are socially penalized

There's a high social cost that comes with lighting up.

(Porch)
Sex & Relationships
  • The home improvement company Porch recently polled 1,009 people on their feelings about smoking.
  • The company recently published the results as infographics.
  • In terms of dating, 80 percent of nonsmokers find the habit a turnoff
Keep reading Show less

The "catch" to being on the keto diet

While short-term results are positive, there is mounting evidence against staying in ketosis for too long.

Brendan Hoffman / Getty
Surprising Science
  • Recent studies showed volunteers lost equal or more weight on high-carb, calorie-restricted diets than low-carb, calorie restricted diets.
  • There might be positive benefits to short-term usage of a ketogenic diet.
  • One dietician warns that the ketogenic diet could put diabetics at risk for diabetic ketoacidosis.
Keep reading Show less