Why is staff development so bad?

[cross-posted

at the TechLearning blog


]

We have known for a long time (decades!) about what constitutes effective

staff development. As the latest version of the National Staff Development

Council Standards for Staff Development

notes, effective staff

development

  • has small groups of educators working together over time in professional

learning communities;

  • is based on principles of effective adult learning; and
  • deepens educators' content knowledge.
  • Yet what does staff development look like in most school districts? Typically

    it involves three or four one-shot "sit and get" (or "spray and pray") sessions

    spread across the year, each on a different topic than the one before, that are

    attended by most or all educators in the organization. A "one size fits all"

    model is used, meaning that there is relatively little differentiation between,

    say, music teachers and math teachers and industrial arts teachers. Sometimes

    schools spice it up a bit and have a buffet day where educators can pick from

    multiple choices throughout the day, much like a professional conference.

    Rarely is there follow-up. Rarely is there sustained, focused conversation

    about a specific learning issue over time. Rarely does educators' staff

    development satisfy any of the three bullet points listed above. In fact,

    schools make deliberate structural choices that directly violate the three

    bullet points above. The end result, of course, is that most school

    organizations' staff development practices have little to no meaningful impact

    on instructional practice and/or student learning outcomes.

    This is a shame, because staff development time and monies might possibly be

    the most scarce resources in schools. Staff development also is one of the only

    mechanisms that schools have for giving employees new skills and turning the

    organization in new directions. It's embarrassing and disappointing that schools

    take this precious, limited resource and squander it.

    So the question is... Given that we know what effective staff development looks

    like, why is most staff development still so bad?

    Stress is contagious–but resilience can be too

    The way that you think about stress can actually transform the effect that it has on you – and others.

    Big Think Edge
    • Stress is contagious, and the higher up in an organization you are the more your stress will be noticed and felt by others.
    • Kelly McGonigal teaches "Reset your mindset to reduce stress" for Big Think Edge.
    • Subscribe to Big Think Edge before we launch on March 30 to get 20% off monthly and annual memberships.
    Keep reading Show less

    5 short podcasts to boost your creativity and success

    These quick bursts of inspiration will brighten your day in 10 minutes or less.

    Personal Growth

    Podcasts can educate us on a variety of topics, but they don't have to last an hour or more to have an impact on the way you perceive the world. Here are five podcasts that will boost your creativity and well-being in 10 minutes or less.

    Keep reading Show less

    Philosopher Alan Watts: 'Why modern education is a hoax'

    Explore a legendary philosopher's take on how society fails to prepare us for education and progress.

    Alan Watts.
    Personal Growth
    • Alan Watts was an instrumental figure in the 1960s counterculture revolution.
    • He believed that we put too much of a focus on intangible goals for our educational and professional careers.
    • Watts believed that the whole educational enterprise is a farce compared to how we should be truly living our lives.
    Keep reading Show less

    Mining the Moon

    How can we use the resources that are already on the Moon to make human exploration of the satellite as economical as possible?

    The All-Terrain Hex-Limbed Extra-Terrestrial Explorer (ATHLETE), a prototype heavy-lift utility vehicle to support future human exploration of extraterrestrial surfaces, at right, is parked beside the Habitat Demonstration Unit - Pressurized Excursion Module (HDU-PEM), at left, a concept off-Earth living and work quarters for astronauts stationed on asteroids, the moon or Mars, 15 September 2010. Photo by: ROBYN BECK/AFP/Getty Images
    Technology & Innovation

    If you were transported to the Moon this very instant, you would surely and rapidly die. That's because there's no atmosphere, the surface temperature varies from a roasting 130 degrees Celsius (266 F) to a bone-chilling minus 170 C (minus 274 F). If the lack of air or horrific heat or cold don't kill you then micrometeorite bombardment or solar radiation will. By all accounts, the Moon is not a hospitable place to be.

    Keep reading Show less