Why is staff development so bad?

[cross-posted

at the TechLearning blog


]

We have known for a long time (decades!) about what constitutes effective

staff development. As the latest version of the National Staff Development

Council Standards for Staff Development

notes, effective staff

development

  • has small groups of educators working together over time in professional

learning communities;

  • is based on principles of effective adult learning; and
  • deepens educators' content knowledge.
  • Yet what does staff development look like in most school districts? Typically

    it involves three or four one-shot "sit and get" (or "spray and pray") sessions

    spread across the year, each on a different topic than the one before, that are

    attended by most or all educators in the organization. A "one size fits all"

    model is used, meaning that there is relatively little differentiation between,

    say, music teachers and math teachers and industrial arts teachers. Sometimes

    schools spice it up a bit and have a buffet day where educators can pick from

    multiple choices throughout the day, much like a professional conference.

    Rarely is there follow-up. Rarely is there sustained, focused conversation

    about a specific learning issue over time. Rarely does educators' staff

    development satisfy any of the three bullet points listed above. In fact,

    schools make deliberate structural choices that directly violate the three

    bullet points above. The end result, of course, is that most school

    organizations' staff development practices have little to no meaningful impact

    on instructional practice and/or student learning outcomes.

    This is a shame, because staff development time and monies might possibly be

    the most scarce resources in schools. Staff development also is one of the only

    mechanisms that schools have for giving employees new skills and turning the

    organization in new directions. It's embarrassing and disappointing that schools

    take this precious, limited resource and squander it.

    So the question is... Given that we know what effective staff development looks

    like, why is most staff development still so bad?

    How Pete Holmes creates comedic flow: Try micro-visualization

    Setting a simple intention and coming prepared can help you — and those around you — win big.

    Videos
    • Setting an intention doesn't have to be complicated, and it can make a great difference when you're hoping for a specific outcome.
    • When comedian Pete Holmes is preparing to record an episode of his podcast, "You Made it Weird with Pete Holmes," he takes 15 seconds to check in with himself. This way, he's primed with his own material and can help guests feel safe and comfortable to share theirs, as well.
    • Taking time to visualize your goal for whatever you've set out to do can help you, your colleagues, and your projects succeed.
    Keep reading Show less

    Brazil's Amazon fires: How they started, and how you can help.

    The Amazon Rainforest is often called "the planet's lungs."

    NASA
    Politics & Current Affairs
    • For weeks, fires have been burning in the Amazon rainforest in Brazil, likely started by farmers and ranchers.
    • Brazil's president, Jair Bolsonaro, has blamed NGOs for starting the flames, offering no evidence to support the claim.
    • There are small steps you can take to help curb deforestation in the Amazon rainforest, which produces about 20 percent of the world's oxygen.
    Keep reading Show less

    Bigotry and hate are more linked to mass shootings than mental illness, experts say

    How do we combat the roots of these hateful forces?

    Photo credit: Rux Centea on Unsplash
    Politics & Current Affairs
    • American Psychological Association sees a dubious and weak link between mental illness and mass shootings.
    • Center for the study of Hate and Extremism has found preliminary evidence that political discourse is tied to hate crimes.
    • Access to guns and violent history is still the number one statistically significant figure that predicts gun violence.
    Keep reading Show less