AQAP: New Talent

In a sign of just how sensitive it is to what I will call Islamist criticisms, al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula wasted little time in responding to what it called "the lies" of Saudi's Minister of the Interior, Prince Nayyif. Specifically, that AQAP was planning terrorist attacks against the upcoming hajj pilgrimage. For me, this is just one more sign of how dangerous AQAP believes these critiques are. It is vulnerable when attacked from an Islamic perspective.

AQAP has attempted to stake out a position of "holier than thou" and anything that challenges this is, the organization realizes, a threat to its continued existence and growth. This is where the US, Yemeni and Saudi governments should be pouring many more resources. (Not that they are devoting much here at the moment.) Look at the response a simple comment from Prince Nayyif gets.

This statement, like #27, which I wrote about here, is particularly fascinating. This is AQAP speaking to its constituents.

There are a number of interesting things to say about this statement. One is the use of the word "Ijrami" (criminal) to describe potential attacks against the hajj. The choice of word is fascinating. And, I believe, tells us something about how AQAP views the attacks that it carries out - namely, that it has to portray them as being against the "enemies of God," or else they too would be criminal. So it is the choice of target and intent - rather than the means or tactics of an attack - that make it legitimate or criminal. This, I think, should give intelligence agencies around the world a much better idea of how to craft their critiques in such a way as to have the maximum impact.

Also interesting to me is the appearance of General Petraeus, the top US Commander in Afghanistan. Now, General Petraeus used to be head of CentCom and as such responsible for Yemen, but that hasn't been the case since General McChrystal self-destructed in a Rolling Stones profile. So why mention Petraeus?

Well, by itself I would be willing to overlook this as the overwrought hyperbole of a jihadi calling out a famous US General, but I don't think that is the case. This is the latest in a series of suggestions that I have seen lately that lead me to believe that there is some new talent in the organization. And I am of the early impression that it is coming from Pakistan/Afghanistan.

If I'm right, this is incredibly worrying. A couple of years ago, I watched as the evidence mounted, suggesting a influx of talent from Saudi Arabia. Over the past few months I have seen - in AQAP audio and video tapes - enough hints and fragmentary pieces of evidence that lead me to believe that a similar thing is happening now. That is people and individuals from Afghanistan and Pakistan are moving to Yemen.

Now none of this is certain - see my caveat on this post - there are incredibly few certain answers in studying groups like al-Qaeda (which is only one of the reasons so many people can get away with saying much of the junk that they do). But the evidence is mounting, and I have seen enough of it to believe that this is happening.

AQAP in my mind, strikes an important early blow in the battle for the hearts and minds of its constituents, making in this statement an early denial that it would ever be behind attacks in mosques or public markets. Instead claiming that these attacks - if they take place - are the work of the "enemies of God" (Petraeus and so on). This is incredibly important. It is setting the framework for the debate, setting the stage while the US is - well, I really have no idea what the US is doing - besides debating about drones - which is incredibly bad idea (but that is another post).

The US ignores this rhetoric at its own peril. Just because it seems self-evidently false to us in the west, doesn't mean that it does to people in Yemen or Saudi Arabia. And just in case you hadn't noticed that is where the war is being fought. But if the US loses this debate (and I have seen no evidence that would lead me to believe it is even aware it is in a debate) the war won't stay there.

Finally, AQAP gets in a shot at the Saudis about ignoring the security threat from Shi'a pilgrims. But this post has gone on too long - so enought for now.

Big Think
Sponsored by Lumina Foundation

Upvote/downvote each of the videos below!

As you vote, keep in mind that we are looking for a winner with the most engaging social venture pitch - an idea you would want to invest in.

Keep reading Show less
  • What distinguishes humans is social learning — and teaching.
  • Crucial to learning and teaching is the value of free expression.
  • And we need political leaders who support environments of social peace and cooperation.

10 paradoxes that will stretch your mind

From time-traveling billiard balls to information-destroying black holes, the world's got plenty of puzzles that are hard to wrap your head around.

Big Think
Surprising Science
  • While it's one of the best on Earth, the human brain has a lot of trouble accounting for certain problems.
  • We've evolved to think of reality in a very specific way, but there are plenty of paradoxes out there to suggest that reality doesn't work quite the way we think it does.
  • Considering these paradoxes is a great way to come to grips with how incomplete our understanding of the universe really is.
Keep reading Show less

The philosophy of tragedy & the tragedy of philosophy - with Simon Critchley

Tragedy in art, from Ancient Greece to Breaking Bad, resists all our efforts to tie reality up in a neat bow, to draw some edifying lesson from it. Instead it confronts us with our own limitations, leaving us scrabbling in the rubble of certainty to figure out what's next.

Think Again Podcasts
  • Why democracy has been unpopular with philosophers
  • Tragedy's reminder that the past isn't finished with us
  • …and why we need art in the first place
Keep reading Show less