AQAP members killed in Saudi

Saudi Arabia has finally revealed the names of the two individuals killed in the shootout in Jizan. (I am seeing this spelled two different ways in Arabic one with an alif and one with a ya - any Saudi scholars that can explain the confusion?)

There is still no word on the identity of the third who was taken into custody. This is the second time in recent months that al-Qaeda has had rather poor luck (I had hoped to write up a quick but detailed post on this but sadly other commitments have made that an impossibility). They weren't stopped at a border post, but rather a rotating police checkpoint that had a female policewoman on duty. What are the odds?

Still, I think the presence of Yusif al-Shihri, a former Guantanamo Bay detainee, suggests that something rather big was in the works. This is where I part company with Mustafa al-'Ani of the Gulf Research Center, who tells al-Sharq al-Awsat that the presence of suicide belts (more accurately vests) indicates that they were planning to assassinate officials. I tend to think they were after something else, having already tried and failed with Muhammad bin Nayif, but I suppose we'll never know. And al-'Ani and myself will both be left with our own views.

Al-'Ani is also quoted in the CSM piece by Caryle Murphy and Laura Kasinof.

I get worried when I see things like this in print:

"Another reason the Yemeni government tolerates the group's presence may be because the jihadi fighters sometimes assist Yemeni forces in military operations against the rebels, a Western diplomat said ..."

As it makes me worry that whoever these anonymous sources are have no clue about what they are commenting on. Certainly this is an accusation that could have been directed at the Yemeni government in years prior to 2006. But there is no evidence that anyone currently in al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, as led by al-Wahayshi has been co-opted or used by the government. This group is a different generation with different goals from previous versions of al-Qaeda in Yemen.

Unless you want to be embarrassingly wrong, it is dangerous to apply yesterday's analysis to today's events. But then again I guess it helps if you don't attach your name to your quote.

I could spend some time disagreeing with other parts about what the Saudis see when they look at Yemen and the concept of under-governed spaces - which I have recently changed my own mind about - but my allotted time for blogging is up for the afternoon and additionally it seems in bad taste.

I am traveling for the next few days and so postings will likely be reduced, although I will try to post at least once a day. No promises.

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

Dead – yes, dead – tardigrade found beneath Antarctica

A completely unexpected discovery beneath the ice.

(Goldstein Lab/Wkikpedia/Tigerspaws/Big Think)
Surprising Science
  • Scientists find remains of a tardigrade and crustaceans in a deep, frozen Antarctic lake.
  • The creatures' origin is unknown, and further study is ongoing.
  • Biology speaks up about Antarctica's history.
Keep reading Show less

Physicists puzzled by strange numbers that could explain reality

Eight-dimensional octonions may hold the clues to solve fundamental mysteries.

Surprising Science
  • Physicists discover complex numbers called octonions that work in 8 dimensions.
  • The numbers have been found linked to fundamental forces of reality.
  • Understanding octonions can lead to a new model of physics.
Keep reading Show less

Why are women more religious than men? Because men are more willing to take risks.

It's one factor that can help explain the religiosity gap.

Photo credit: Alina Strong on Unsplash
Culture & Religion
  • Sociologists have long observed a gap between the religiosity of men and women.
  • A recent study used data from several national surveys to compare religiosity, risk-taking preferences and demographic information among more than 20,000 American adolescents.
  • The results suggest that risk-taking preferences might partly explain the gender differences in religiosity.
Keep reading Show less