David Goggins
Former Navy Seal
Career Development
Bryan Cranston
Critical Thinking
Liv Boeree
International Poker Champion
Emotional Intelligence
Amaryllis Fox
Former CIA Clandestine Operative
Chris Hadfield
Retired Canadian Astronaut & Author
from the world's big
Start Learning

We can improve politics in America. Here’s how.

Here's how to have a healthier relationship with politics.

EZRA KLEIN: I think the single healthiest thing most of us can do for our relationship with politics and for politics would be to deemphasize our connection to national politics and reemphasize our connection to state and local politics. Our political system is not built to be this nationalized. One of the very powerful cross-cutting identities we're supposed to have are our regional and our state and our local identities. James Madison said it was just obvious that state political identities would be preeminent over national identities. He turned out, in the long sweep of American history, to be wrong, but there's a truth to why he said that, a thing that that was supposed to do for the system, which is you're not supposed to be in politics just as a national Republican or Democrat. Even if you are doing that you're supposed to be an Oklahoma Republican or a Missouri Democrat and that there are distinct things your state and your city and your place need not supposed to help discipline just separating into two overwhelming factions. Over time that has weakened; it's probably weakened because the media has become overwhelmingly nationalized. I grew up outside of Los Angeles, California, and we got the LA Times, I listened to KCRW, you know, I could listen to the nightly news, but if I were growing up there now I would probably have an online subscription to The New York Times and I would read or listen to Vox and other national podcasts.

And so this is change. I had a very strong California-oriented political identity growing up; today I probably would have a lot less of one. So, this is sometimes a hard thing to do for ourselves because the media has nationalized, a lot of state and local outlets have gone out of business or have been weakened or gutted, which is a terrible thing that deserves a lot of solutions and thinking of its own. But usually there is a lot more we can do and so one thing you can do is just be intentional about your informational ecosystem. If you are just getting, and you realize you're getting 90 percent of your news is national and international and only ten percent is state and local or sometimes less than that is state and local, think about reconstructing a news diet so it doesn't look that way, sign up for newsletters, subscribe to your local paper, make sure that's on your bookmarks, make sure you're not over-reading all your news through nationalized social media and instead you're going to places that are going to give you these very different things. And then when you're getting involved in politics it's a real big difference between getting involved in politics by tweeting mean things at pundits you don't like, like me on Twitter, and getting involved by organizing people in your local community to make change. Being on Twitter, yelling at the cable news TV screen, is really frustrating; it's not a nourishing way of being in politics because you don't feel listened to, you don't see any affect from what you're doing. Whereas working with people in your community to do things, it really does move things very quickly. Your state representative, your state senator, your city council person they'll probably meet with you, listen to you. They would love it if somebody paid attention to what they were doing and tried to influence them, whereas your congressman, your senator, governor, presidential candidate—it's a lot harder to get their attention.

So, one thing we could all do that would be healthier is to try intentionally to rebuild those state and local political identities and to put down, and I recognize this is against interest for a natural political reporter to say, but to try to deemphasize a bit all that national news and all that national conflict we're consuming. It's just not the case that the only kind of politics worth being involved in is national. And even if you do ultimately want to be involved in national politics, the thing that national candidates need and that thing that national political organizations need are people who know how to organize actual people in their own home communities.

  • "[T]he single healthiest thing most of us can do for our relationship with politics and for politics would be to deemphasize our connection to national politics and reemphasize our connection to state and local politics," says Ezra Klein.
  • The media has become overwhelmingly nationalized. To improve your relationship with politics, and to improve politics in general, be intentional about your informational ecosystem.
  • Klein recommends reconstructing your news diet so it doesn't overwhelmingly feature national politics, rather sign up for local newsletters, subscribe to your local paper, and get involved in community politics rather than yelling at cable TV or lashing out on Twitter.

LIVE ON MONDAY | "Lights, camera, activism!" with Judith Light

Join multiple Tony and Emmy Award-winning actress Judith Light live on Big Think at 2 pm ET on Monday.

Big Think LIVE

Add event to calendar

AppleGoogleOffice 365OutlookOutlook.comYahoo

Keep reading Show less

Study details the negative environmental impact of online shopping

Frequent shopping for single items adds to our carbon footprint.

Photo by George Frey/Getty Images
Politics & Current Affairs
  • A new study shows e-commerce sites like Amazon leave larger greenhouse gas footprints than retail stores.
  • Ordering online from retail stores has an even smaller footprint than going to the store yourself.
  • Greening efforts by major e-commerce sites won't curb wasteful consumer habits. Consolidating online orders can make a difference.
Keep reading Show less

Childhood sleeping problems may signal mental disorders later in life

Chronic irregular sleep in children was associated with psychotic experiences in adolescence, according to a recent study out of the University of Birmingham's School of Psychology.

Personal Growth
  • We spend 40 percent of our childhoods asleep, a time for cognitive growth and development.
  • A recent study found an association between irregular sleep patterns in childhood and either psychotic experiences or borderline personality disorder during teenage years.
  • The researchers hope their findings can help identify at-risk youth to improve early intervention.
  • Keep reading Show less

    Neom, Saudi Arabia's $500 billion megacity, reaches its next phase

    Construction of the $500 billion dollar tech city-state of the future is moving ahead.

    Credit: Neom
    Technology & Innovation
    • The futuristic megacity Neom is being built in Saudi Arabia.
    • The city will be fully automated, leading in health, education and quality of life.
    • It will feature an artificial moon, cloud seeding, robotic gladiators and flying taxis.
    Keep reading Show less

    Why do people believe in conspiracy theories?

    Are we genetically inclined for superstition or just fearful of the truth?

    • From secret societies to faked moon landings, one thing that humanity seems to have an endless supply of is conspiracy theories. In this compilation, physicist Michio Kaku, science communicator Bill Nye, psychologist Sarah Rose Cavanagh, skeptic Michael Shermer, and actor and playwright John Cameron Mitchell consider the nature of truth and why some groups believe the things they do.
    • "I think there's a gene for superstition, a gene for hearsay, a gene for magic, a gene for magical thinking," argues Kaku. The theoretical physicist says that science goes against "natural thinking," and that the superstition gene persists because, one out of ten times, it actually worked and saved us.
    • Other theories shared include the idea of cognitive dissonance, the dangerous power of fear to inhibit critical thinking, and Hollywood's romanticization of conspiracies. Because conspiracy theories are so diverse and multifaceted, combating them has not been an easy task for science.