Is healthcare a public good?

Question: Is healthcare a public good?

Peter Thiel: I think healthcare is too important to be a public good, in a sense.  So I think that it’s too important to be left to the very incompetent government programs that we have taking care of it. 

Obviously you can debate about some kind of minimum safety net where, again, I would not differentiate healthcare and treat it in a separate category.  In the same way if someone’s starving to death, or someone didn’t have a place to live or things like that.   There’s definitely a minimum set of things we should take care of that are not that expensive.  Something like that’s probably true in healthcare, although I wouldn’t treat it as this good that’s radically separate from all kinds of other basic necessities. 

But in terms of the quality of that, I think is very, very open to debate.  My own sense is that place where the entitlements have generally gone the most wrong is with respect to middle class entitlements.  I think there’s people who are poor who are not well off. It doesn’t cost that much to have some safety net for them.  We can debate whether it’s good or bad, but it’s just not that expensive.  But I think the thing that’s really distorted things are the middle class entitlements like Medicare; Social Security for everybody; certain aspects of the education system, certain aspects of all sorts of other things the government’s doing.

Recorded on: Sep 05, 2007

Health care is too much of a public good to be left to incompetent government programs.

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Sponsored
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

Brain study finds circuits that may help you keep your cool

Research by neuroscientists at MIT's Picower Institute for Learning and Memory helps explain how the brain regulates arousal.

Photo by CHARLY TRIBALLEAU / AFP/ Getty Images
Mind & Brain

MIT News

The big day has come: You are taking your road test to get your driver's license. As you start your mom's car with a stern-faced evaluator in the passenger seat, you know you'll need to be alert but not so excited that you make mistakes. Even if you are simultaneously sleep-deprived and full of nervous energy, you need your brain to moderate your level of arousal so that you do your best.

Keep reading Show less

34 years ago, a KGB defector chillingly predicted modern America

A disturbing interview given by a KGB defector in 1984 describes America of today and outlines four stages of mass brainwashing used by the KGB.

Politics & Current Affairs
  • Bezmenov described this process as "a great brainwashing" which has four basic stages.
  • The first stage is called "demoralization" which takes from 15 to 20 years to achieve.
  • According to the former KGB agent, that is the minimum number of years it takes to re-educate one generation of students that is normally exposed to the ideology of its country.
Keep reading Show less

How pharmaceutical companies game the patent system

When these companies compete, in the current system, the people lose.

Politics & Current Affairs
  • When a company reaches the top of the ladder, they typically kick it away so that others cannot climb up on it. The aim? So that another company can't compete.
  • When this phenomenon happens in the pharmaceutical world, companies quickly apply for broad protection of their patents, which can last up to 20 years, and fence off research areas for others. The result of this? They stay at the top of the ladder, at the cost of everyday people benefitting from increased competition.
  • Since companies have worked out how to legally game the system, Amin argues we need to get rid of this "one size fits all" system, which treats product innovation the same as product invention. Companies should still receive an incentive for coming up with new products, he says, but not 20 years if the product is the result of "tweaking" an existing one.