USA should remain neutral over a nuclear Iran
Why are we telling Iran that nuclear weapons in their hands would be unacceptable? They are a sovereign nation, they can do what they want. What becomes an issue is when they start talking about using one against another sovereign nation, and that is what we should be addressing, but to simply patronize them and say that their possession of a nuke would be unacceptable seems like a immature way to deal with the issue. When they view us, justifiably, as arrogant, condescending and meddling they are far less likely to respond in a constructive way. If I were Sec of State I would tell them that we, the USA, respect Iran's right as a sovereign nation to pursue whatever policy they deem to be in their self-interest, but that we remain concerned, however, for our allies in the region and that we wish to discuss this issue.
New research links urban planning and political polarization.
- Canadian researchers find that excessive reliance on cars changes political views.
- Decades of car-centric urban planning normalized unsustainable lifestyles.
- People who prefer personal comfort elect politicians who represent such views.
Progressive America would be half as big, but twice as populated as its conservative twin.
- America's two political tribes have consolidated into 'red' and 'blue' nations, with seemingly irreconcilable differences.
- Perhaps the best way to stop the infighting is to go for a divorce and give the two nations a country each
- Based on the UN's partition plan for Israel/Palestine, this proposal provides territorial contiguity and sea access to both 'red' and 'blue' America
Science and the squishiness of the human mind. The joys of wearing whatever the hell you want, and so much more.
- Why can't we have a human-sized cat tree?
- What would happen if you got a spoonful of a neutron star?
- Why do we insist on dividing our wonderfully complex selves into boring little boxes
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.