World Tournaments Promote Peace

Think the Olympic Games and the World Cup are just about sports?


Olympian Kelly Clark can attest to the goodwill that these global tournaments promote. “It's been amazing as an athlete to see what sports can do,” she told Big Think. “There's so much opportunity to focus on negative things, and there's so much opportunity to focus on things that can divide us. And sports have the ability to defuse that.”

Clark, a champion halfpipe snowboarder, won the gold in 2002 in Salt Lake City, and bronze medals in the 2010 Vancouver and 2014 Sochi games. She has also been tirelessly championing talented young athletes through the Kelly Clark Foundation, which breaks down financial barriers for snowboarders. Her foundation has awarded over $60,000 in scholarships to date. She continues to compete, and has won 70 halfpipe competitions, including gold medals in 9 X Games.

“I've seen nothing but good things as a result of sports and I've loved being part of the Olympic Games, and I love watching things like the World Cup, because I know what that's doing for the countries and for the people in the counties,” she says of the power of sports to bring the world together. Proving her point, on Tuesday, after Germany's stunning defeat of Brazil, Clovis Acosta Fernandes, one of the many Brazilian fans snapped crying by photographers and dubbed "The Saddest Man in Brazil," gave his replica World Cup trophy to a German fan. "You deserve it, congratulations!" he told the Germany supporter, according to the Independent.

Watch this clip from Big Think’s interview with Clark for her take on why global tournaments matter:

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Sponsored
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

Brain study finds circuits that may help you keep your cool

Research by neuroscientists at MIT's Picower Institute for Learning and Memory helps explain how the brain regulates arousal.

Photo by CHARLY TRIBALLEAU / AFP/ Getty Images
Mind & Brain

MIT News

The big day has come: You are taking your road test to get your driver's license. As you start your mom's car with a stern-faced evaluator in the passenger seat, you know you'll need to be alert but not so excited that you make mistakes. Even if you are simultaneously sleep-deprived and full of nervous energy, you need your brain to moderate your level of arousal so that you do your best.

Keep reading Show less

34 years ago, a KGB defector chillingly predicted modern America

A disturbing interview given by a KGB defector in 1984 describes America of today and outlines four stages of mass brainwashing used by the KGB.

Politics & Current Affairs
  • Bezmenov described this process as "a great brainwashing" which has four basic stages.
  • The first stage is called "demoralization" which takes from 15 to 20 years to achieve.
  • According to the former KGB agent, that is the minimum number of years it takes to re-educate one generation of students that is normally exposed to the ideology of its country.
Keep reading Show less

How pharmaceutical companies game the patent system

When these companies compete, in the current system, the people lose.

Politics & Current Affairs
  • When a company reaches the top of the ladder, they typically kick it away so that others cannot climb up on it. The aim? So that another company can't compete.
  • When this phenomenon happens in the pharmaceutical world, companies quickly apply for broad protection of their patents, which can last up to 20 years, and fence off research areas for others. The result of this? They stay at the top of the ladder, at the cost of everyday people benefitting from increased competition.
  • Since companies have worked out how to legally game the system, Amin argues we need to get rid of this "one size fits all" system, which treats product innovation the same as product invention. Companies should still receive an incentive for coming up with new products, he says, but not 20 years if the product is the result of "tweaking" an existing one.