The Humble Beginnings of China's Economy
The world's second largest economy can trace its roots back to a document stored in the roof of a mud hut.
An Phung is a multimedia journalist based in New York City. She has contributed to NYTimes.com, Patch.com and City Limits. She also spent time reporting in Indonesia where she covered stories about the country's growing illicit drug trade. An graduated from CUNY Graduate School of Journalism with a concentration in international reporting.
Follow me on Twitter @anhaiphung
What is the Big Idea?
It turns out that ground zero for China's economic boom was in Xiaogang, a small, rural farming village in the Anhui Province. On the night of Nov. 24, 1978, farmers from 18 households in this village drafted and signed a secret document that changed the way their collective farm operated.
It's a story that China's government likes to brag about. If you haven't heard it before, listen to it here on a recent Planet Money podcast.
China's economic system at the height of communism forbid farmers to keep what they harvested. Instead, crops were collected, redistributed and each person received about 100 pounds of rice each year. The families never had enough to eat, which meant they had to go to neighboring villages to beg for food.
The secret contract changed all this. It stipulated that they divide the land equally and each farmer kept what they harvested. This was controversial because ownership was prohibited at the time. The document, hidden in the roof of a mud hut, posed such a threat that there was a clause in the contract that said if a signer was imprisoned or executed for the plan, the rest of the village would raise their children until 18 years of age.
This system was a huge success. It resulted in more food than the five previous years combined. The farmers brought China to the precipice of economic reform. Xiaogang was China's first capitalist society, one that was replicated by the government in other collectives, and one that led to other modern marvels in China.
What is the Significance?
Not all economic changes have been beneficial for China. Sure, an open market lifted almost 500 million people out of poverty, replaced oil lamps with electricity, dirt roads with highways, and hutongs with skyscrapers. But when the economic growth surpasses infrastructure and policy changes, a new host of social, health and wealth disparities ensue.
Listen to Mark Leonard, Executive Director of the European Council on Foreign Relations, weigh in on the issue.
"You’ve had hundreds of millions of people literally move from agricultural backwardness into kind of multi-industrial economy," said Leonard. "And this has generated a vast amount of wealth, and we all know that China’s economy is growing exponentially. But as this economic growth has proceeded, it has also created a whole series of new problems which China didn’t deal with before."
Watch the video here:
Photo credit: shutterstock.com
The ability to speak clearly, succinctly, and powerfully is easier than you think
The ability to communicate effectively can make or break a person's assessment of your intelligence, competence, and authenticity.
Antimicrobial resistance is growing worldwide, rendering many "work horse" medicines ineffective. Without intervention, drug-resistant pathogens could lead to millions of deaths by 2050. Thankfully, companies like Pfizer are taking action.
- Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens are one of the largest threats to global health today.
- As we get older, our immune systems age, increasing our risk of life threatening infections. Without reliable antibiotics, life expectancy could decline for the first time in modern history.
- If antibiotics become ineffective, common infections could result in hospitalization or even death. Life-saving interventions like cancer treatments and organ transplantation would become more difficult, more often resulting in death. Routine procedures would become hard to perform.
- Without intervention, resistant pathogens could result in 10 million annual deaths by 2050.
- By taking a multi-faceted approach—inclusive of adherence to good stewardship, surveillance and responsible manufacturing practices, as well as an emphasis on prevention and treatment—companies like Pfizer are fighting to help curb the spread.
Journalism got a big wake up call in 2016. Can we be optimistic about the future of media?
- "[T]o have a democracy that thrives and actually that manages to stay alive at all, you need regular citizens being able to get good, solid information," says Craig Newmark.
- The only constructive way to deal with fake news? Support trustworthy media. In 2018, Newmark was announced as a major donor of two new media organizations, The City, which will report on New York City-area stories which may have otherwise gone unreported, and The Markup, which will report on technology.
- Greater transparency of fact-checking within media organizations could help confront and correct fake news. Organizations already exist to make media more trustworthy — are we using them? There's The Trust Project, International Fact-Checkers Network, and Tech & Check.
SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by The Big Think, Inc. All rights reserved.