How Too Much "New Knowledge" Can Harm Scientific Advancement

There is a lot of very elegant research on vaccines, but the key question is whether we can make a product that is manufacturable, and can be used safely when and where it is needed.

When the H1N1 swine flu pandemic hit in 2009, like every parent I was desperate to protect my little girl. It took about six months from the time the flu appeared for a vaccine to be developed, and when it was available, I stood in a line two blocks long on a Sunday morning to make sure she was protected.

I work on researching ways to invent and improve vaccines that prevent diseases and keep people healthy. There is a lot of very elegant research on vaccines, but the key question for me is whether we can distill it down to make a product that is manufacturable and can be used safely when and where it is needed.

At the International Disease Research Institute (IDRI), we try to answer that question through our holistic approach to fighting infectious diseases. We combine the high-quality science of a research organization with the product development focus of a biotechnology company to create new diagnostics, drugs and vaccines.

There are two main hurdles to operating in this way. First, we must be selective in what we choose to pursue.


During the course of our research, we come across many interesting findings that merit more investigation from a scientific or academic perspective but are not critical when it comes to developing a product. To overcome this natural attraction to new knowledge, we must deliberately maintain our focus on the research areas that affect product development. This is essential if we are to deliver real products rather than just publish research findings.

Second, the ability to straddle the product development spectrum from discovery to manufacture in a small organization requires people with a unique combination of adaptable and cross-cutting expertise.

We must maintain this at all levels, including scientific, manufacturing, clinical, and administrative members of the team. To realize our ambitious goals requires people who can interact on a daily basis with colleagues from vastly different backgrounds to troubleshoot challenges and generate solutions. IDRI is the antithesis of the ivory tower.

One successful result of our holistic approach is our work on adjuvants, which are substances added to vaccines to help make them more effective. Our research has led to effective products that are saving lives.

Traditionally, vaccines were created by taking a pathogen or “bug” and either attenuating it or completely killing it, then using that to stimulate an immune response in our bodies that was strong enough to protect us against subsequent exposure to that pathogen, but not so much that the vaccine itself would cause harm.


Science is now removing that risk of harm by focusing more on a synthetic approach to vaccines, where we identify the key components of the pathogen, usually a protein, and synthetically make that protein and use it as the core component of a vaccine.

The problem is that the components are so pure and small that the body doesn’t always recognize the need to fight back. Adding an adjuvant can increase the immune response by producing more antibodies, giving a person better protection.

Adjuvants also allow for something we call dose sparing: because adjuvants boost the immune response you're getting from the same amount of vaccine, you can use less vaccine. For something like pandemic flu, this is absolutely critical, because it means we can get anywhere from two to thirty times as many doses, vastly multiplying manufacturing capacity in a pandemic.

As a non-profit, our approach to working across the development spectrum allows us to do what we are most passionate about — developing products for neglected diseases that are not attractive for typical pharmaceutical companies. We can bring our product development expertise to bear on problems of resource-poor areas, and the technology we develop in the course of our upstream research can potentially be leveraged for other rich world indications that will help sustain our mission to focus on global health.

Moreover, IDRI is a strong proponent of local capacity building, so we transfer our technology to developing country manufacturers throughout the world to increase access, train local scientists, and enhance opportunities to combat neglected diseases together.

If all goes to plan, next time a flu pandemic strikes, parents everywhere will be able to quickly get the right vaccines for their children.

--

LinkedIn meets Tinder in this mindful networking app

Swipe right to make the connections that could change your career.

Getty Images
Sponsored
Swipe right. Match. Meet over coffee or set up a call.

No, we aren't talking about Tinder. Introducing Shapr, a free app that helps people with synergistic professional goals and skill sets easily meet and collaborate.

Keep reading Show less

People who engage in fat-shaming tend to score high in this personality trait

A new study explores how certain personality traits affect individuals' attitudes on obesity in others.

Pixabay
Mind & Brain
  • The study compared personality traits and obesity views among more than 3,000 mothers.
  • The results showed that the personality traits neuroticism and extraversion are linked to more negative views and behaviors related to obesity.
  • People who scored high in conscientiousness are more likely to experience "fat phobia.
Keep reading Show less

4 anti-scientific beliefs and their damaging consequences

The rise of anti-scientific thinking and conspiracy is a concerning trend.

Moon Landing Apollo
popular
  • Fifty years later after one of the greatest achievements of mankind, there's a growing number of moon landing deniers. They are part of a larger trend of anti-scientific thinking.
  • Climate change, anti-vaccination and other assorted conspiratorial mindsets are a detriment and show a tangible impediment to fostering real progress or societal change.
  • All of these separate anti-scientific beliefs share a troubling root of intellectual dishonesty and ignorance.
Keep reading Show less

Reigning in brutality - how one man's outrage led to the Red Cross and the Geneva Conventions

The history of the Geneva Conventions tells us how the international community draws the line on brutality.

Napoleon III at the Battle of Solferino. Painting by Adolphe Yvon. 1861.
Politics & Current Affairs
  • Henry Dunant's work led to the Red Cross and conventions on treating prisoners humanely.
  • Four Geneva Conventions defined the rules for prisoners of war, torture, naval and medical personnel and more.
  • Amendments to the agreements reflect the modern world but have not been ratified by all countries.
Keep reading Show less